Truth, Obliterated: The “Obama Conspiracy Theory” Psychological Assault Weapon

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2012 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.
This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK ABOVE

If you appreciate the information presented at Terrible Truth, please assist me in my work by contributing $25.00 [or whatever you can afford].

America, if you’ve felt assaulted every time you seek the Truth about the personal history of “Barack Obama II”, you haven’t been over-reacting.

You have been assaulted.

Assaulted by the greatest Psychological Assault Weapon ever levied against Americans.

It’s name?

The “Obama Conspiracy Theory” Psychological Assault Weapon.

Its purpose?

To personally demolish you – thereby dis-engaging you from discourse about Obama’s personal history - so that whatever “Obama” Truth you’re on to, gets obliterated!

The “Obama Conspiracy Theory” Psychological Assault Weapon [OCTPAW] was designed by The Obama Campaign to utterly destroy those who question the “Official Obama Narrative”. Since its initial deployment in 2007, this weapon of words has been extremely effective – with ridicule, mocking, shaming, scolding, lying, accusation, word-twisting, confusion creation, threatening and intimidation embedded in its warhead.

It’s precision-designed to knock us, full force, back on our heels.

Without our quite knowing what hit us. What was that massive assault on our thoughts, our beliefs, our principles, our feelings? On our very Integrity? Why oh why are we feeling so awful, just for seeking Truth?  Do we really want to put ourselves ‘out there’ again, only to get painfully struck down once more?

Oh, what a weapon!

Like its co-inventors – “Uncle Fred” Newman and The Prince Of Lies – the “Obama Conspiracy Theory” Psychological Assault Weapon is sneaky. It’s invisible. In perfect keeping with everything about the “Barack Obama II” synthetic identity, it’s thoroughly deceptive.

Designed to facilitate evil, it stinks of righteousness. Crafted to effect subversion of Truth, it claims moral integrity. Dedicated to effect our destruction, it purports to love America and its founding principles.

Why, there’s even a website, ready and ever-vigilant, that immediately shoots down on the web any talk of Truth about “Obama”. Via posts by “Dr. Conspiracy”, and a vigorous, nasty horde of attacker commenter ‘identities’, Obama Conspiracy Theories thrashes and trashes any person who seeks or states Truth about Obama’s personal history.  http://www.obamaconspiracy.org

OCTPAW was The 2008 Obama Campaign’s most highly prized weapon.

It’s how they managed to defraud America.

It’s how they attacked and destroyed all who reasonably questioned the personal history of “Barack Obama II”, as presented by him, and his Campaign.

It’s how they managed to get him elected, get him ‘certified’, get him sworn in, keep him in office, and to [thus far] keep him propped up, to secure his re-election.

In one brief sentence, here’s how OCTPAW works:

You ask for Truth about the personal history of “Obama”,

and immediately,

from multiple sources, simultaneously,

you’re assaulted with humiliating accusations

and threats.

In a flash, multiple vicious invisible voices swarm about you, sniping, smacking, tearing at you, accusing you of racism, foolishness, and mental instability, while twisting and distorting your thoughts and words to make them seem preposterous.

You’re caught in a vortex of ruthless attack, that spins you round and round, as you try to respond. Spins you so fast, so furiously, you’re dizzy.

And totally spent.

Typical cognitive attacks include:

“Oh, so fifty years ago, two people got together to create a child, a name, and documentation, just so that he could destroy America?”

“Do you really believe that a hospital, health department,  and newspapers all conspired decades ago to defraud America?”

“Are you accusing The Sitting President’s dead parents of criminal fraud?!! Are you accusing him?!!”

That is – there’s something REALLY WRONG with your thinking ability, to think there’s something wrong with the Official Obama Narrative. A defect which will surely land you in court.

Emotional attacks assail you with charges of mental instability, fringe thinking, weirdo posturing, paranoia, shameful behavior, hate crimes, and more.

Spiritual attacks search out and destroy your sense of decency, morality, and fairness.

Professional attacks tear at your status as a valued professional person.

In every attack, with laugh-out-loud ridiculing intensity, you’re insulted and degraded, kicked at, spit upon, and trounced - by a gang of attackers.

What’s nastier, all attacks impart the vicious proclamation that by questioning the ‘Officlal Narrative’ of “Barack Obama II” you are racist.

And stupid, pathetic, ignorant, fringe, hateful, disgusting, laughable, a sicko, a loner, a loser, a flunkie, and an embarrassment to America.

It’s not just ridicule that the attackers rely on.

The psychodynamics of aggressive, concerted, group attack play an important role. When OCTPAW strikes, every syllable you utter in reply is swooped down upon, caught up, and carried off in multiple attackers’ evil claws; and mockingly bandied about in cyberspace. Setting off bouts of resounding, mocking laughter by voices you ‘hear’ in comments posted, from faces you cannot see. You don’t know where the next attack will come from. You don’t know what it will be. You do know this: it is you, versus many. An orchestrated, ruthless, evil-minded many with an evident thrill-of-the-kill mindset.

Aaah, what a perfect weapon OCTPAW was!

But now that The Laser Light Of Truth has shone upon it, their perfect weapon no longer can work like it used to.

And here’s the ironic reality, behind the reality:

The Truth lies not far from the assaults!

The “Obama Conspiracy” is no theory.

A dastardly deed of conspiracy was effected.

Though not in the way they present it.

And not by the players hurled at us in their vicious psychological attacks.

The “Obama Conspiracy” was the brainchild of one person.

A person oh-so-close to the man who presents as “Barack Obama II”.

Not Jo Ann Newman, the actual identity of “Barack Obama II’s” mother. http://marthatrowbridgeterribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/15/stan-the-sham-and-true-love/

Nor “Obama’s” father, Malcolm X.

No.

The “Obama Conspiracy” was brewed in the brain of “Uncle Fred” Newman. http://marthatrowbridgeterribletruth.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/obama-rui-running-under-the-influence-of-uncle-fred/

Who, since the early 1960′s, all these decades, worked madly to actualize his cherished vision of America: AMERICA, DEMOLISHED.

Destroyed from the inside out - just as Fred did, over and over, in his radical political activism.

Fred’s winning m.o.?  Infiltrate, take over, destroy. http://www.adl.org/special_reports/nap.asp

Fred Newman not only had motive, he had great opportunity to create the “Obama Conspiracy”. As a radical psychologist-therapist, radical playwright, and radical political activist working for the socialist overthrow of America, for decades Fred was ‘on the ground’, testing and de-bugging what would become the greatest scam in human political history – the creation, marketing, and Presidential Election of A Synthetic Identity!

A Synthetic Identity programmed to enact Fred’s Socialist Revolutionary Vision.

At its inception, The “Obama Conspiracy” was principally a conspiracy of synthetic identities, contrived digital images, biographical lies, forged documents, altered records, and false family history, actualized by the man who presents as “Barack Hussein Obama II”.

That is:

The original principal conspirators with”Uncle Fred”Newman and Bâri’ M. Shabazz [a.k.a. "Barack Obama II"] are objects!

Objects that conspired to establish and support the synthetic identity “Barack Obama II”.

Objects Fred Newman could ‘trust’.

Now, Master Schemer “Uncle Fred” knew darn well, that his “Barack Obama II” synthetic identity wasn’t foolproof.

He knew there was no actual birth record. No actual marriage document for the parents of “Barack Obama II”. No actual divorce decree.

He knew that actual school records, actual family photos, an actual ssn application, actual passports, and other typical documentation could not be produced.

He knew that his “Barack Obama II” digital smoke and mirrors would carry him only so far. And that “RACIST” shout-outs would not do the trick forever.

If Fred Newman’s Master Scheme were to endure scrutiny, he had to create an automatic, Reaganesque ‘Star Wars’ defense to infallibly shoot down anyone who spoke up.

And so, America, to protect and preserve Fred’s “Barack Obama II” synthetic identity, the “Obama Conspiracy Theory” Psychological Assault Weapon was born!

History will attest: inventing and deploying OCTPAW was nothing short of Genius.

Evil Genius.

Evil Genius à la Fred Newman, Ph.D. -  a.k.a. “Obama’s” “Uncle Fred”. http://marthatrowbridgeterribletruth.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/obama-rui-running-under-the-influence-of-uncle-fred/

Now that you know what OCTPAW is, if you can stand it, here’s a look inside.

A Prince Of  Lies masterpiece, the “Obama Conspiracy Theory” Psychological Assault Weapon is multipronged; and psychologically lethal upon impact.

It’s a weapon so dizzying, so masterful, so painfully and throughly destructive - and so impalpable - that when hit by it, we are drawn into a whirlwind vortex of confusion, pain and distress, then blown to bits.

A weapon so precision-crafted, it slays any and all advances toward Truth.

Multi-pronged with emotional, cognitive and spiritual barbs, it targets our deepest sense of positive self-regard,  obliterating us – and thereby, our quest for Truth – upon impact.

Eight noxious, painful, humiliating psychological attack-modes simultaneously activate upon impact:

1. Ridiculing your intellect, your personality, your motive, your character, and your professional standing

2. Shaming you as a person and as a citizen; declaration of you as a weirdo; pronouncement of you as intrinsically BAD; identification of the innmerable ‘people’ who are LAUGHING AT YOU and the many more who WILL laugh at you, if you continue on in your questioning

3. Confusing you with megadose injections of crazy-making doubt – causing you to question both the validity of your information and the validity of your thinking

4. Distracting you, via cognitive-emotional overwhelm – from the topic at hand: TRUTH ABOUT “OBAMA”. This attack element is critical to the success of the weapon. The assault is so powerful, so overwhelming, so concerted because it is orchestrated to destroy all of your faculties and senses simultaneously; coercing you, the target, to immediately shift into survival mode; hence you are drawn away from the subject – Truth about “Obama” -  to instinctively focus upon stopping your deep, painful psychological wounding

5. Isolating you by declaring that you are ALONE in your position – except for the very few other ‘lunatics’ who agree with you. The isolating strategy imparts a warning: if you don’t cease and desist in your questioning, everyone will think you’re hopelessly cracked, a weirdo, crazy, fringe, a wacko, a nut-case, a right-wing extremist, a domestic terrorist, and oh, worst of all, an incurable ‘birther’ - one who repeatedly has been presented with the truth but stubbornly, without logic, refuses to accept it

6. Scolding you for having questions about the highest elected official in the land. [What are you, a moron - how could he have made it to the top if he were a fraud?!] How dare you question him?!  How could you, the nobody that you are, question The Sitting President Of The United States?!!! Such blatant disrespect!!

7. Intimidating you with their FAR SUPERIOR intellectual power, moral position, and political power. And of course, legal and judicial power. You’d better quit right now, while you can. While we’re nice enough to let you go, scot-free.

8. [When All Else Fails] THREATENING you with legal action.

America, if we intend to render ineffective their outrageous Attacks Against Truth, there’s something fundamental we need to understand.

The “Obama Conspiracy Theory” Psychological Assault Weapon can’t be deployed just anywhere.

It only functions in ‘virtual’ space. That is, on the internet.

It relies on the cyberworld’s structure to do its dastardly deed.

With Fred-Newman-Style infiltration of public forums like blogs, chat rooms, discussion groups and newspaper comment areas.

With multiple phony ‘identities’ possible per attacker – to give the illusion of multiple attackers. And, to afford one attacker the opportunity to converse with himself, as if several people are chiming in, agreeing.

Visit most websites, and talk Truth about “Obama”, and a swarm of attackers swoop down upon you. In rapid succession, a different ‘person’ swarms at you from a different direction, utilizing a different technique, to attack, destroy, and devour you.

In just a few minutes, there’s nothing left of you – not even your feathers.

If you recover, and once again brave the multi-pronged, multi-’identity’ attacks, back they come at you.

To ensure that you don’t return, on and on they attack you, long after you depart, to warn you what will become of you should you dare return.

One particularly effective OCTPAW technique: the evil ‘identities’ converse with each other, raucously, endlessly mocking you!

Keep in mind that it is highly likely that only one person exists behind multiple attacker ‘identities’.

As was Fred’s hallmark, stealth is key. Keep in mind that OCTPAW can ONLY WORK when attackers remain invisible.  The anonymity afforded to internet attackers provides them protective cover – from identification, and from prosecution.

If you’re in doubt as to whether you’ve been hit by OCTPAW, check around at other websites. Compare the m.o. Compare the tone. Compare the language. The marks of this beast are clear.  Detect them, and it is unlikely that an ‘ordinary citizen’ is the force you are up against.

Take heart, America! All this is soon to be swept in the toxic ash heap of “Obama” History.

The “Obama Conspiracy Theory” Psychological Assault Weapon will not hold us at bay for long!

We now know how it operates.

And we know their strategic secret:

The Obama Campaign War On Truth is successfully waged on one battleground only – the internet.

The ‘flash mob’ attacks of virtual voices do not emanate from the American People - though this is what they want us to believe.

The onslaught springs from a small number of “Obama” political operatives, working digitally - and invisibly, under fake identities - to continually psychologically assault Truth-seeking Americans.

Just as digital images – fake photos and fake documents – have been the means by which The Obama Campaign succeeded in defrauding the America Electorate, Digital Attacks have been the springboard of their continued Assault On Truth.

America, if you want to turn the evildoers on their heads, here’s Step One.

Withdraw your quest for exposing “Obama” from the internet.

Instead, invest your energies in talking with others, in person. At dinner parties. Barbecues. Church gatherings. Go door-to-door, if it suits you.

Share your legitimate concerns the old-fashioned way – by in-person, rational, honest discussion with fellow Americans. Point to the evidence. And to “Obama’s” lack thereof.

The first thing you’ll notice is how quiet the discussion is.

The next thing you’ll notice: these days, in the real world, there’s not much resistance. Americans are finally getting that we’ve been ‘had’.

And, in an unexpected way, so is the man who presents himself as “Barack Hussein Obama II”.

Bâri’ M. Shabazz must see that his narcissist “Uncle Fred” never gave a hoot about what would happen to him, once his cover was blown.

In his monstrous arrogance, and gargantuan callousness, Fred surely assured him that this day would never come.

Boy, was Fred mistaken.

And boy, was he gravely mistaken about something else.

With the activation of weapons, there’s fallout.

They who activate weapons can get destroyed in the process.

For all the damage it’s done to America, OCTPAW has materially damaged “Obama”.

In four years of strikes against determined Truth-Seekers, the assaults have boomeranged their Database Of Deceit, dismantling – and laying bare – their “Obama Narrative” lies.

Exposed forever are the phony “Obama Family” digital images.  The altered digital records. The multiple inconsistencies in what they presented as “Obama’s” family history. Their heap of synthetic identity invention now lies limp and pathetic, the remains of someone despised.

Blessedly, through the rubble, the underpinning Truth has emerged.

- There is no authentic paper record of a “Barack Hussein Obama II” birth certificate. In Hawaii. Or in any other state.

- There is no authentic record – paper or otherwise – of a name change by Bâri’ M. Shabazz - or any interim identity - to “Barack Hussein Obama II”.

- There was no “Stanley Ann Dunham”.

- There was no “Barack Hussein Obama II” born to “Stanley Ann” and Barack Sr.

America, it’s not “Obama’s” track record on the economy, or the prospect of an appealing Republican contender, that signals real trouble for The Obama 2012 Campaign.

That spells gloomy doom for the man who presents as “Barack Obama II”.

The media, pundits, and campaign workers all have missed what’s missing, this time around.

Fred.

Fred is dead. Gone.

“Uncle Fred” Newman. The schemer, the dreamer, the diabolical mastermind.

The guy who for decades, all through the scam, ‘had “Barack’s” back’.

The guy who could always invent more evil, to defend and protect what he’d already put in place.

“Barack Obama II” knows: the scam has shattered. And Fred’s not here to patch things back together.

These days, “Barack” is not just alone. He’s not just lost.

These days, he’s [appropriately] scared.

The Truth, Exposed For All To See, is far too terrible.

If you don’t believe me, take a good long look at him. Thumb through the photos posted daily, online.  Study his troubled face. His worried eyes. His chronically-grimaced mouth.

See what the photojournalists see.

Watch the reactions by Heads Of State. Watch The Secret Service – who seem to be watching him, far more than they watch the crowd.

Watch Michelle, when she thinks the camera’s not watching.

I conclude with two questions.

If today at John Wayne Airport, Marine One touched down, and actor John Wayne were there, waiting, what would be his reaction to The Alias President, audaciously enroute to a re-election fundraiser?  http://news.yahoo.com/photos/president-barack-obama-heads-car-walking-off-marine-photo-172107428.html

Picture “Obama”, eyeball to eyeball with The Duke.

Who would you place your bet on? The Duke? Or The Fraud?

If you appreciate the information presented at Terrible Truth, please assist me in my work by contributing $25.00 [or whatever you can afford].

CORRECTION:

This post was in error regarding the date of establishment of the “Obama Conspiracy” website.

“Dr. C.” reports that it was established in December 2008 - after the election.

Interestingly, the website was established before the Inauguration of “Barack Obama II”.

This raises an important question: why then?  Why would there be need to shoot down talk about Truth, when the election was over? Was there legitimate concern that “Barack Obama II” might not make it to his swearing-in ceremony?

Gimme Something Real: Mario Apuzzo On The Jeff Rense Program Tonight

by Martha Trowbridge

America, if you’re wondering where our beloved country has ‘gone’, take a look at what the White House is boasting for Today’s Presidential Accomplishments.

“In the evening, the President will participate in an interview with YouTube and Google+ to discuss his State of the Union Address. The interview will be held through a Google+ Hangout, making it the first completely virtual interview from the White House.” http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2012/01/president_obama_official_sched_815.html

“The first completely virtual interview from the White House.”

Like – wow!!!!

Like – hey man, let’s ‘Google+ Hangout’ tonight with the Prez!

President “Obama” makes valuable history these days, doesn’t he?

Or is something far more strategic at work?

For, perhaps tonight’s ‘historical event’ is the harbinger of The Obama 2012 Campaign’s new strategic direction  - A Completely Virtual “Obama” Reality!

To make virtual birth certificates, virtual family photos, virtual transcripts, a virtual maternal passport, a virtual Selective Service Registration, virtual parental identities, and all else that is downright fraudulent perfectly mesh with the “Barack Obama II” synthetic identity!

My, how it all makes sense, doesn’t it?!

Actually, it’s extraordinary!

As of tonight, the “Barack Obama II” synthetic identity is now perfectly appointed with every possible virtual accompaniment.

On this 30th day of January in the Year Of Our Lord 2012, America, it is my distinct disgust yet responsibility to announce:

“Obama” Virtual Reality is officially, fully established.

If you’re as sickened as I am, tonight, set your computer to the Jeff Rense Radio Program.

Attorney Mario Apuzzo will be Jeff’s guest, discussing “Obama’s” Actual Reality. Like his Constitutional Ineligibility for The United States Presidency. The multiple Presidential Ballot Challenges to “Obama’s” eligibility – including what’s transpiring in Georgia.

And the “Barack Obama II” Virtual Birth Certificate. The reality of which has yet to be produced.

Mario is featured beginning at 8PM Pacific / 11PM Eastern at this link: http://www.renseradio.com/listenlive.htm

I don’t know about you, but I can’t wait. “I’ve had enough thrills, now I need something real” [Ashford & Simpson].

Tonight, please join me as I tune in to a show worth tuning in to: Mario Apuzzo and Jeff Rense. http://www.renseradio.com/listenlive.htm

Let’s cast our attentions upon Two Men Of Integrity Discussing Historical Election Fraud.

As Ashford & Simpson crooned, long before our virtual disaster of a 2008 Presidential Election, “Gimme Something Real”:

http://www.vevo.com/watch/ashford-and-simpson/gimme-something-real/USV470900008

‘Professor’ Fred, ‘Eliza’ Bâri′, And Reverend Dr. King

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2012 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.
This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK ABOVE

If you appreciate the information presented at Terrible Truth, please assist me in my work by contributing $25.00 [or whatever you can afford].

In George Bernard Shaw’s famous play Pygmalion, a cocky professor bets he can take a girl from the streets of London and so transform her, she will pass for a duchess amongst British elite. Professor Henry Higgins’s scheme with Eliza Dolittle will succeed, he is confident, “by teaching her to assume a veneer of gentility, the most important element of which, he believes, is impeccable speech.”  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pygmalion_(play)

Higgins’ scheme to ‘fundamentally transform’ Eliza had great ‘social purpose’: by so doing, he would slap society in the face, by infiltrating the upper classes with a fake persona who pretended to be one of them.

Not for a moment did Professor Higgins concern himself with what would become of Eliza, once his experiment concluded.

Or, if it failed, and she was ‘outed’.

George Bermard Shaw, an “ardent socialist” was not only a playwright, he was a political activist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bernard_Shaw

Now, who in the “Barack Obama” family constellation does this remind us of?

That’s right.

“Uncle Fred” Newman.

“Obama’s” “Uncle Fred” - master socialist political activist, and ‘social justice’ playwright. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/10/nyregion/fred-newman-76-anti-party-advocate-in-new-york-city-politics-dies.html?_r=2&ref=todayspaper

Copyright The New York Times / Librado Romero Photograph / Fred Newman in 2009

As I revealed in Obama RUI: Running Under The Influence Of Uncle Fred, “Barack Obama II” was most probably a character created by “Uncle Fred”, to effect his four-decades-long dastardly scheme to overthrow America. http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2012/01/05/obama-rui-running-under-the-influence-of-uncle-fred/

To slap America in the face with socialism, by infilitrating America’s White House with a candidate who purported to be ‘one of us’.

Enter, stage left: Fred’s leading male character, “Barack Obama”.

The young man chosen – decades ago – to play this character: Bâri′ M. Shabazz, son of Fred’s close biological relative, Jo Ann Newman, and Malcolm X.

This weekend, as we reflect upon the accomplishments of one outstanding black man – Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. – I ask you, America, to reflect upon the unrealized potential of another.

Dr. King urged us to judge a man, not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character.

In his spirit, I ask you to envision the second man, at this moment, at long last poised for authentic greatness – by stepping out of the character “Barack Obama”.

And stepping into a future of Integrity.

Yes, I’ve heard the outcry from the right, about my vision.

I’ve ‘heard’ it even louder from the left, who greatly fear repercussions of such a move by “Obama’; repercussions that range from embarrassment to terror of their prosecution for collusion.

Yet consider this: maybe, just maybe, “Barack Obama” has had enough.

Maybe he knows that what he’s done along the way, to effect Fred’s scheme, was not okay. That contrary to his father’s rash dictate ["By Any Means Necessary"] the end, in Truth, did not justify the means.

Maybe he wants out.

For maybe, quite painfully, “Barack Obama” now comprehends that as young Bâri′ M. Shabazz – son of Malcolm X – he was nothing but “Eliza Dolittle” to scheming ‘Professor’ Newman.

A face, a bio, a brain, and a grin that ‘Professor’ Fred Newman could ruthlessly direct to actualize his demonic vision of the destruction of America.

“Uncle Fred” who, in concert with The Prince Of Lies, lured young, lonely, lost Bâri′ with promises of great power, great fame, great fortune.

And wholly unmet promises of great happiness.

Without one care about what would happen to Bâri′, once the scheme was exposed.

Understand this: I am not asking you to pity “Obama”. To accept or condone what he did. To tell him, hey, it’s okay, forget it, you had your reasons.

Not at all.

I’m simply asking, in the spirit of Dr. King, to give Bâri′ safe space to throw off his past, and, as his father Malcolm was famous for doing, ‘reinvent’ the way he thinks, and acts, and lives.

So that from this day forward, he has the opportunity to make amends with America, in an authentic way.

As we celebrate the visionary, oh so important life of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., I ask you to envision something awesome:

The Fundamental Transformation Of “Obama”.

His Fundamental Transformation into the man whom every man is born to be – A Man Of Integrity.

In the spirit of ‘fraternal correction’ http://www.opusdei.us/art.php?p=12619  I ask you, Bâri′, please: this weekend, as you honor his life, bathe your soul in Dr. King’s wisdom. Let not your life’s legacy be anything but one in which you are judged by the content of your character.

Let America, in years henceforth, joyously celebrate your life as a truly great black American, not because you ‘won’ The White House, but because, as United States President, you had the courage to acknowledge “I did wrong.”

And the grace to authentically promise: “I’m going to make amends.”

*******************************

If you appreciate the information presented at Terrible Truth, please assist me in my work by contributing $25.00 [or whatever you can afford].

A Birth, A Death, A Point Of Entry For Evil

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2012 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.
This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK ABOVE

If you appreciate the information presented at Terrible Truth, please assist me in my work by contributing $25.00 [or whatever you can afford].

America, there seems to be no end – and no limit – to what is done to protect and defend the synthetic identity “Barack Obama”.

It’s living, breathing, evil.

Once you’ve read this post, I sense you’ll agree.

The impetus for this recent evil act: Truth has been making inroads. It’s now in hot pursuit of lies.

And the liars know it.

The night before last, in a rare moment of leisure, Dean Haskins’ story about the missing birth record of baby girl Virginia Sunahara caught my eye. http://www.birthersummit.org/news/73-was-baby-virginia-sunaharas-identity-stolen.html

Why is Virginia’s life and death relevant to Terrible Truth’s pursuit of “Obama” lies?

Because it looks like her tiny, precious place in human history was commandeered to make way for the synthetic identity “Barack Obama II”.

If you haven’t followed the Hawaiian birth certificate story:

Much ado has been made of the birth certificate number of “Barack Obama”. Why is it out-of-logical-sequence, given that it is higher than that of twin girls born the following day?

Why oh why?

As the pursuit of Truth about “Obama’s” place of birth intensified these past few years, discovery was made that a baby girl – Virginia Sunahara – was born on the same day as “Obama” claims to be born.

Sadly, baby Virginia died one day after her birth.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/13/research-summary-on-hawaii-birth-certificate-number-151-1961-010641/

Aware of the controversy about “Obama’s” birth, and the coincident date of his sister’s birth, when Virginia’s brother, Duncan, sought a copy of Virginia’s birth certificate, he was met with stunning news.

“Oddly, it had been reported in 2010 that DOH Director, Loretta Fuddy, had claimed that no records existed for Virginia Sunahara.“

http://www.birthersummit.org/news/73-was-baby-virginia-sunaharas-identity-stolen.html

Where had her birth record gone?!

Was her ‘place’ in Hawaii birth history commandeered to make room for “Barack Obama II”?

In October 2011, with the help of Dean Haskins, Duncan Sunahara requested a copy of his sister Virginia’s Certificate Of Death.

Stamped 3 November 2011 here is a cropped section of what he received:

Courtesy, Dean Haskins

America, as you study this image, I ask you:

Have you ever seen a Death Certificate that featured a BIRTH NUMBER?

No one I know has!

Numerous other ‘red flags’ appear – in just the header of this document.

For starters,

- The font size of STATE OF HAWAII differs from the font size of its companion DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH header.

- The placement of STATE OF HAWAII is farther from the left margin than is DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH to the right margin.

Professionally printed forms would never evidence such irregularities.

Ponder this as well: NO. after T.H. FILE is larger, a different font, and imposed upon the document.

Compare and contrast these irregularities with a known official 1961 Hawaii form.

In the official HI Certificate Of Live Birth below, the document header is preprinted with FILE NUMBER 151 - the state code.

As with STATE OF HAWAII and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, the text is clearly uniform in font style and size.

Unlike the ‘official’ Sunahara document.

Why would such anomalies present? In Sunahara’s Certificate Of Death, was NO. inserted after FILE to create the effect of parallel structure with BIRTH NO.?

And ponder this: the stamped number 2 151 following T.H. FILE NO. 151 makes no sense.

2 151 was likely added to offset / balance the conspicuous addition of the BIRTH NO. field.

For those you who get a headache looking at numbers, here’s a window into why this document may indeed reek of corruption:

The header section is demonstrably taller than is the header section of the Hawaii Certificate of Birth.

In Sunahara’s Certificate Of Death, could this be to accommodate the spurious insertion of the BIRTH NO. field?

America, I sense you’ll agree: to snuff out the tiny history of a baby girl, whose time on earth measured less than one full day, cannot be adequately conveyed by the word ‘ruthless’.

And I wonder: could it be, that it was the same ruthless hand who snuffed out the life – in official records – of innocently-born Bâri′ M. Shabazz?

Amidst all this disturbing discovery, I noticed something else that was striking.

Not long after Dean Haskins posted the 6 January 2012 update to his story, “Dr. Conspiracy”, commonly known as “Dr. C.”, posted a commentary about this matter: http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/01/another-1961-certificate-number/

As I continue to read his assiduous postings on behalf of “Barack Obama”, I can’t help but sense that “Dr. Conspiracy” is a character created by playwright “Uncle Fred” Newman, Ph.D.

Another synthetic identity ‘tailor-made’ to effect Fred Newman’s Grand-Socialist-U. S.-Overthrow Scheme.

Another role he expected Bâri′, obediently, to play.

Fred Newman thought of everything, didn’t he?

Except two things:

- The Laser Light Of Truth.

- He wouldn’t live long enough to ‘be there’ for President Bâri′.

Consider Dr. Conspiracy’s astonishing statement of 8 January 2012, at his blog:

“Obama’s eligibility is a fascinating, rich and multi-layered story with twists and turns and surprising connections.” http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/01/the-georgia-birther-ballot-challenge/

Now, to what could he possibly be referring?

The “rich and multi-layered story” of baby Bâri′M. Shabazz, illegitimate, biracial son of Malcolm X, shipped overseas to get him out of Malcolm’s way, purported for the baby boy’s “own good”?

The “twists and turns” of young Bâri′s emotionally excruciating, existentially lonely life?  His ‘homecoming’ to “Uncle Fred” Newman, who craftily welcomed him into the family – only because he could serve as Fred’s perfect political pawn?

The “surprising connections” that “Barack Obama” is, indeed, a synthetic identity created to cover his birth identity as Bâri′ M. Shabazz, son of Malcolm X and Jo Ann Newman?

Stay tuned, America. Rachet up your prayers.

You may be about to witness a major miracle.

Without “Uncle Fred’s” scheming, dictatorial, callous grasp on him, Bâri′ is free to think for himself.

He can shake off ‘wrong’, and from this moment on, choose ‘right’.

Via “Dr. C.”,  he may be about to step into Integrity, and tell America the “fascinating, rich, multi-layered” Truth about “Obama”.

——————————

To meet “Uncle Fred” Newman, please see: “Obama, RUI: Running Under The Influence Of “Uncle Fred”

——————————

If you appreciate the information presented at Terrible Truth, please assist me in my work by contributing $25.00 [or whatever you can afford].

Obama, RUI: Running Under The Influence Of “Uncle Fred”

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2012 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.
This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK ABOVE

If you appreciate the information presented at Terrible Truth, please assist me in my work by contributing $25.00 [or whatever you can afford].

If you’ve been wondering why New Yorker Jo Ann Newman – the mother of “Barack Obama” – was cloaked in the synthetic identity of a girl from Kansas, then transplanted to America’s farthest western reaches, wonder no more.

Soon, you’ll know exactly why The Obama Campaign created “Stanley Ann Dunham”,  and set her far, far away from the Bronx.

It wasn’t just to hide her sexual relationship with Malcolm X.

The Obama Campaign plunked Jo Ann Newman – disguised as “Stanley Ann Dunham” – in America’s Heartland to conceal her close biological relationship with Frederick “Delano” Newman, PhD – a.k.a. Fred Newman.

“Uncle Fred”, that is.

Oh-oh. I’d better ssssh – Fred’s a closely guarded family secret.

Once you meet him, you’ll see why.

“Uncle Fred” is politically toxic to “Barack Obama”.

So toxic, that when he was steppin’ out, if America met his “Uncle Fred”, “Barack Obama” would never have become a story.

There wouldn’t even have been a Chapter One.

It’s not just Fred Newman’s DESTROY AMERICA’S FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES that make him political poison for “Barack Obama”.

Nor is it just Fred’s scheme to DESTROY CAPITALISM.

As you will see, it’s the very nature of “Uncle Fred’s” psyche that “Barack Obama” had to hide.

A psyche that, among other things, sought to DESTROY THE AMERICAN FAMILY.

And to snuff out the spirit of America’s treasured Judaeo-Christian principles.

America, permit me to introduce you to “Uncle Fred”.  Once you meet him, you’ll finally understand “Barack Obama”.

You’ll totally ‘get’ why no one could ever know his mother was a Newman.

And you’ll come to comprehend, as did I, that the Malcolm X angle motivation for creation of the synthetic identity “Stanley Ann Dunham” pales in significance, compared to the Fred Newman angle.

Because this post is so important, I will not tire you, detailing Dr. Fred Newman’s accomplishments for the radical left -  like his New Alliance Party, The Independence Party Of New York, and his management of [African American] Dr. Lenora Fulani’s two Presidential Campaigns.

I will not exhaust you with elaborate discussion of  Fred’s formation of the International Workers Party [IWP] - the purpose of which was to effect an international socialist revolution.

And I will not require too much of your time, examining Fred Newman’s CFCs - Centers For Change.

Or his signature psychotherapy, that blended his “friendosexuality” model with mandatory socialist political activism.

Or his creation of All Stars Project - a program for youth that’s raised more than a few eyebrows.  http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/devloan.htm

There’s so much about “Uncle Fred” of which most Americans have no clue!

Which is exactly how The Obama Campaign needed it to be.

After reading this post, if you want to spend time really getting to know “Uncle Fred” by his works, stop by here:        http://www.publiceye.org/newman/cloudsblur.html

In particular, review “Fred Newman And The Historical Roots Of The Newmanites” http://www.publiceye.org/newman/nap4.html

Another perspective: “PsychoPolitics: Inside The Independence Party Of Fred Newman” http://www.rickross.com/reference/new_alliance/new_alliance52.html

Thoughts and feelings from former ‘Newmanites’:  http://ex-iwp.org/

So much to learn about “Uncle Fred”! So little time!

For now, America, let’s just meet Fred Newman.

Let’s meet this “Barack Obama” “family secret” man in his own words.

And in the words of some of those who knew him.

Reportedly, on 17 June 1935, Fred was born to Jewish parents and raised in working-class Bronx County, New York City, not far from Yankee Stadium. Viewing his Stuyvesant High School Yearbook from 1952, you’d never know what radical thoughts were a-brew in his head.

An innocent enough image, yes?  Seems like a typical 1950′s American high school boy. Varsity and J.V Baseball, J.V. Football, Basketball. Journalism Club, History Club. Art Editor for the Yearbook. Fred Newman was Class V.P.  He’d even been awarded the Stuyvesant High School Leader Award.

Clearly, as a young man, Fred Newman was gifted, versatile, accomplished and valued at school.

What promise he held, working ‘within the system’.

Now, compare young Fred with this self-portrait snapshot of “Uncle Fred”, who commences his essay “The Women I Live With” [published in Practice, Winter 1990] thus:

“I am an American Marxist Leninist revolutionary living at a time when orthodox communism throughout the world has died. And if that weren’t enough I am a controversial revolutionary. I’ve never been part of the official US left family. I don’t like the institution of the family in any of its forms [my emphasis]. People I’ve never met and who know nothing of me often say terribly nasty things about me. Oh well, as my mother (as anti-Family a mom as ever was) [my emphasis] used to say, “if you can’t stand the goddamn heat, get the hell out of the kitchen.” “

Youch.

The picture-perfect circa WWII American family, yes?

But back to Fred. To his essay.

It’s published in Winter 1990.

America, think…Winter 1990…Bâri’ M. Shabazz, midway through Harvard Law School, is enroute to becoming Editor of the prestigious Harvard Law Review.  He’s getting known ‘in high places’ as “Barack Obama”.

Daddy Malcolm X is safely, forever buried. [So Bâri' thinks.]

Oooo la la. All is going perfectly, according to plan!

But, what to do about Mom’s side of the family? Heaven forbid, America meets “Uncle Fred”.

No way can “Barack Obama” achieve the far-reaching political demands upon him – or achieve his own grand ambitions -  if America knew of Fred Newman.

For, all ye political strategists, let’s face facts: What can you do with a family member like “Uncle Fred”?

Truth is, his perspective on women and marriage aside, there’s an awful lot about Fred Newman for “Barack Obama” to worry about.

Here are but two of Fred’s politically pesky credentials: the tenets of his cult-esque ‘social therapy’ model of psychotherapy; and his unique brand of deceptive political infiltration to achieve political victory.

Let’s start with Fred’s psychotherapy.

From his Social Therapy organization’s website:

“Fred Newman, Ph.D. was a practicing therapist for almost 40 years. He was the founder of social therapy, which is now recognized as a revolutionary practice of psychotherapy [my emphasis]  http://www.socialtherapygroup.com/styled/FredNewmanbio.html

Yes, “revolutionary“.

As you read on, you’ll see: everything about Fred Newman reeked of revolution.

You’ve got to wonder why.

And, why does a man with a Ph.D. in analytic philosophy and the foundations of mathematics [Stanford University, 1962] deem himself an expert in psychotherapy?

Ask yourself this: Why would he want to position himself as a psychotherapist?

Here’s why:

Fred Newman understood, far ahead of others, that political revolutions flare when painful emotions get stoked.

Political revolutions flare when painful emotions get stoked.

Now, which American President does this sound like??

How does ‘revolutionary’ psychotherapy interconnect with political revolution?

It’s simple:

“The roots of social therapy are in the social upheaval, anti-authoritarianism, creativity and radical humanism of the 1960s.”         http://www.socialtherapygroup.com/about_social_therapy/origins.html

Meaning:

If you have emotional, mental, social and/or financial sufferings, says “Uncle Fred’s” model, they’re rooted in your Personal Oppressor - The United States Government.

If The United States Government were changed, Fred taught, you wouldn’t have any problems.

Your life would have hope.

Fred’s therapeutic prescription: To solve your problems, and bring hope to your life, have “free sex” with others in your therapy group [Fred's signature friendosexuality"] – including sex with Fred and/or your therapist – and enlist in Fred’s political organizing network - devoting the rest of your life to enacting political change.

Hope, via political overthrow. Hope, via Change.

Hmmm.

Wait.

Wasn’t CHANGE ”Obama’s” 2008 Election Mantra? …. CHANGE that gives you HOPE?

As in “The fundamental transformation of America”?

Are you beginning to see how, in 2008, Presidential Candidate “Barack Obama” was RUI?

Running Under The Influence of “Uncle Fred”?

Oh dear. We keep getting sidetracked away from Fred.

His use of ‘Hope’ to lure his followers.

For Fred Newman, it wasn’t Hope and Joy. Or Hope and Love. Or Hope and Peace.

It was Hope and Change.

Fred imbued his patients with HOPE of being happy, if they CHANGED the United States Government.

Bond Fred’s alluring promise of HOPE – and his use of sex as bait – with his charisma, shrewd political genius, and impressive capacity to ‘organize’, and what do you get?

Followers. Ooodles of them.

An army of Fred Newman Soldiers, marching faithfully forward, to advance his socialist agenda.

Fred’s seduction of the suffering downtrodden had Machiavellian purpose: to use their collective power to effect his international socialist vision. His elitist [Stanford] Ph.D., exceptional intellect, interpersonal charm, lure of unbridled sexual freedom, and persuasive persona enabled him to mesmerize those in positions of weakness – financially, emotionally, socially. The typical ‘leader’, Fred had answers. He had solutions. He had conviction. And he had vision. All, of course, cloaked in the guise of doing his followers a great favor – he guaranteed dramatic improvement of their lives, via his socialist political vision.

It was all about power.

Though not for Fred’s followers.      http://www.publiceye.org/newman/cloudsblur.html

But that was okay for Fred. After all, they were ‘saved’. They were ‘Newmanites’!

Interestingly, outsider observers as well as former followers have dubbed Fred Newman a cult leader. For opinions of Fred from former ‘Newmanites’, please check here: http://ex-iwp.org/

And here: http://www.rickross.com/groups/new_alliance.html

Back to that pivotal time – the early 1990′s.

Summer 1992, in fact.

“Barack Obama” is in Chicago, working for Sanford Newman.

He’s community organizing, Fred-Newman-style.

Hmmm….

“Barack Obama”, Harvard Law School hot shot, out in Chicago’s worst neighborhoods, engaged in Fred-Newman-style community organizing.

“Obama” publicly steppin’ out, positioning himself as altruistic Ivy League ‘champion of the underclass’ - under the auspices of Sanford Newman.

“Obama” steppin’ out, and quickly escorted to political victory – by the wheels, perhaps,  of “Uncle Fred’s” well-tuned election machine??

Wheels skillfully guided by Sanford Newman?

Hmmm….

I wonder who’s son Sanford is?

“At 19, [Fred Newman] volunteered to serve in Korea, partly to escape a painful love affair.”      http://www.rickross.com/reference/new_alliance/new_alliance7.html

“Painful” – like in, pregnant girlfriend? Like in, child out of wedlock? Like in, got to get out of town, Fred? 

Could it be that Sanford Newman is an early-on son of Fred Newman?

Oh, dear! So many Newmans!

“Obama’s” Mama, Jo Ann Newman.

His “Uncle Fred” Newman.

And now, could it be? - “Cousin” Sanford Newman??!

By now, you likely understand why oh why The Obama Campaign had to invent a mother named “Stanley Ann Dunham”.  And set her as far away as possible from New York City.

American Voters just wouldn’t, just couldn’t tolerate Mama’s side of his family!

You also likely comprehend why “Barack Obama” couldn’t ‘step out’ in New York City.

It was right smack within the Fred Newman Political Epicenter.

And “Obama’s” relationship with “Uncle Fred” must be kept secret!

Back to 1992. “Barack Obama”, fresh out of Harvard Law School, first black Editor of the prestigious Harvard Law Review, is working for Sanford Newman and Project Vote [ACORN's progenitor], “Community Organizing” in Chicago.

Community Organizing a la “Uncle Fred”.

Note how Sanford Newman speaks of “Obama” as if he were a stranger:

“Instead of accepting far more prestigious and better paying offers, Mr. Obama accepted a grueling job with Project Vote for a meager salary. He believed so much in the democratic process that he even gave up the contract for publication of his book, not knowing whether he would ever find another publisher.” http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/gaynor/110228

Excuse me, Sanford, here’s the Truth: Obama didn’t give up his book contract. The publisher is the party who dissolved it. What’s more, though Poseidon Press / Simon & Schuster wanted their hefty financial advance returned, they caved when “Barack Obama” cried poormouth.

Now, back to Fred.

In summer 1992, “Uncle Fred’s” New Alliance Party holds its National Convention in New York City, with CSPAN televising it.

[Thank you, God, for CSPAN.]

America, rather than watch a movie tonight, spend three hours with “Uncle Fred”, courtesy of CSPAN. Listen. Watch. Take notes.

You’ll never look at “Barack Obama” quite the same way again.

In Dr. Fred Newman’s 1992 NAP Convention address, you’ll hear all about the etiology of “Barack Obama’s” economic policies.

And you’ll finally get to see “Barack Obama” In Context!

The family context that has evaded political pundits and everyday citizens alike!

Fred Newman’s NEW ALLIANCE PARTY CONVENTION / C-SPAN Video, August 22, 1992   http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/31529-1

Notable 1992 NAP Convention quotes from Political Genius “Uncle Fred”:

- “THERE”S GOT TO BE A REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH.”

- “THERE WON’T BE A REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH UNLESS WE DE-REGULATE DEMOCRACY.”

I could go on and on. But won’t  - it’s far more effective if you hear it from Fred yourself.

Now, don’t just take my take on “Uncle Fred”.

Not surprisingly, The Federal Bureau Of Investigation had their eye on Fred Newman.

[Check out their Fred Newman / New Alliance Party files, in their vault at fbi.gov]

As with Jo Ann Newman, mother of “Barack Obama”, who was ‘known’ to The F.B.I. via her relationship with Malcolm X, again, I pose our American Electorate’s Existential Question: Was the F.B.I. unaware of – or were they involved in -  the cover-up of “Barack Obama’s” actual identity?

America, again, I ask you: which is worse, federal incompetence or federal collusion?

If you can think of another explanation, please, I truly would love to hear it.

Because, given what’s happened to the Democratic Party the last few years, I think the country has a right to know.

If you’ve been wondering just how the radical left managed to infiltrate and seize power from the Democratic Party, you need not look any farther than “Uncle Fred” Newman.

Originally published in November 1995,  the Anti-Defamation League exposed “Uncle Fred’s” political operating genius in ”A Cult By Any Other Name: The New Alliance Party Dismantled And Reincarnated”. http://www.adl.org/special_reports/nap.asp

Please, hold that thought: The New Alliance Party Dismantled And Reincarnated.

Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? It sounds like what’s going on with ACORN since its ‘official’ disbanding.

ACORN, child of Project VOTE, established and directed by – yes, you remember - Sanford Newman!

America: you’re beginning to get the picture, yes?

And now, as if you hadn’t heard enough about dear “Uncle Fred”, I feel obliged to relay another “Uncle Fred” fact.

It’s sure to run a Chill Up The Spine Of Sleeping America.

“Uncle Fred’s” International Workers Party – a Marxist-Leninist [i.e. Communist] Party intending to evoke worldwide socialist revolution – is the foundation upon which all Fred’s political activity was built.

All of it.

Because of marked public aversion, shrewd Fred withdrew International Workers Party from public scrutiny, in order to achieve his socialist revolutionary goals.

He knew he’d never get far in America, being open about what he stood for.

So, he decided to move forward with his vision surreptitiously.

After all, doing such a thing was something Malcolm X openly advocated. You got where you needed to go “By Any Means Necessary”.

“Newman has stated that IWP [International Workers Party] disbanded in 1976, but several recent accounts from former members of the New Alliance Party contradict this claim [my emphasis]. William Pleasant, a former high-ranking member and editor of NAP’s weekly National Alliance, told the Black-oriented, New York-based City Sun last year that not only does Newman still run IWP, but that Pleasant himself “was a member of the International Workers Party, which is an underground Marxist-Leninist party…. It’s still in existence and they still collect dues from people every week. It’s the party that created NAP [Fred's New Alliance Party].”

That is:

“Uncle Fred” Newman’s Marxist-Leninist International Workers Party is the c.p.u. of what he cleverly presented as a democratic New Alliance Party.

Fred’s oh-so-effective political party activism m.o.: cloak your intentions, infiltrate, and commandeer.

Which brings us to the key strategic strength of “Uncle Fred”: his political party infiltration genius.

Anyone know where the Democratic Party went, especially since “Barack Obama” stepped on scene?

Hmmm.

I truly regret having to tell you this, but it’s a Terrible Truth that must be told.

“Kelly Gasinke, a member of NAP from 1987 until 1992, described the orientation process for new members of IWP. She explained to the City Sun that “when you are going to join this secret conspiratorial organization” [my emphasis] you are asked “if you are willing to become part of a Marxist-Leninist organization. And they tell you that it’s a conspiracy to overthrow the government. It’s a combat organization that has a revolutionary strategy.” [my emphasis] http://www.adl.org/special_reports/nap.asp

America, keep these three words always in mind: secret conspiratorial organization.

Along with these eight words: a combat organization that has a revolutionary strategy.

Secrecy. Infiltration. Revolution.

Anyone out there still wondering what happened to America?

While secrecy and revolution are commonplace, infiltration is an art.

One which Fred Newman mastered.

Infiltration, I sense, is how Fred Newman achieved what he did.

From Psycho-Politics: What Kind Of Party Is This, Anyway?:  “Newman now says that he and his followers intended to enter the National Caucus Of Labor Committees to “change it from the inside”   http://www.ex-iwp.org/fn008.php

Aaaah. “Change it from the inside.”

As in:

Work for Michael Bloomberg for New York City Mayor - get your feet firmly inside the door!  [Ever notice the "Obama" - Bloomberg bond?] Fred boasted that it was his Independence Party support of Bloomberg that threw him the election; in return, Fred’s numerous enterprises have received great financial and other support from The City Of New York.   http://lyndonlarouche.net/whatsnew.htm

Work for The Patriot Party – an organization founded in 1994 by followers of Ross Perot!  [See Fred at  Patriot Party Second Annual Convention, May 20, 1995, courtesy of C-SPAN:  http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/PartySe ]

Wait! 1995…Isn’t that the year Candidate “Barack Obama” is steppin’ out in Chicago?

Things are really happenin’!

With all your great field experience, Fred, why not go for America’s Political Jugular?

Why not work for political ‘Change’ – while vigorously waving in the noses of the discontented, your signature seduction ‘Hope’ - within The Democratic Party?

After decades of practice, via “Barack Obama” Fred Newman managed to pull off the greatest coup in American Political History - commandeering the Democratic Party, without Party Operatives even noticing he was doing it.

Without most Democrats noticing, even to this day!

That’s political genius for you! That’s “Uncle Fred”!

Dr. Fred Newman – such a master at working behind the scenes, most people on ‘the outside’ don’t even know his name.

When working on this research, I queried two highly educated progressive friends, both of whom are staunch “Obama” supporters. One was a far left-wing, politically active New Yorker way back when in the late nineteen eighties – Fred’s political activism heyday.

“What do you know of Fred Newman?” I asked.

“Who?” they both responded.

“Fred Newman. You know, The New Alliance Party. Patriot Party. Centers For Change.”

“Don’t know him,”  they each replied.

America, thanks to Terrible Truth, you sure know “Uncle Fred” now.

By the time “Barack Obama’ announced his Presidential bid, Fred Newman had already managed three Presidential Campaigns for black candidates.

Is it illogical to suspect that “The Obama Campaign” was secretly managed by “Uncle Fred”?

Sure seems like it was, from where I sit.

Who else would have so carefully groomed “Obama”? Escorted him so swiftly up the ranks?

Given Fred’s Machiavellian genius, and his on-the-ground experience, is it any surprise “Obama” did so well, so fast?

Recall “Obama’s” close relationship with ACORN, a Project VOTE brainchild?

Recall Sanford Newman, via Project VOTE , launching “Obama”, grooming “Obama”, from the get-go, in Chicago? Recall Sanford’s lavish praise?

Sanford Newman – as in ‘Newman’?

Always, always, keep in mind, for many serious reasons, The Obama Campaign had to be careful to hide “Uncle Fred”.

So don’t be surprised if most staff members of The Obama Campaign know nothing of Fred.

Oh, dear. 2007. 2008. What guiding whispers to Axelrod did we miss?

What under-the-radar pointers were given to Rahm? To Anita Dunn?

From what I now understand, it is my belief that Dr. Fred Newman’s influence upon the campaign / political style of “Barack Obama” is as profound as is Sukarno’s influence upon his governing style.

If you still doubt “Barack Obama’s” close connection to Fred Newman – and Fred Newman’s close connection to “Obama” - here’s something to reflect upon.

“Obama’s” first nominee for United States Supreme Court Justice -  Sonia Sotomayor – for several years before her appointment, worked for Fred Newman causes:  http://lyndonlarouche.org/sotomayor.htm

Fred Newman was reported to have died on 3 July 2011.

Here is the New York Times ‘official’ obituary:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/10/nyregion/fred-newman-76-anti-party-advocate-in-new-york-city-politics-dies.html?pagewanted=all

If you’re as weary as I am of the “Barack Obama” deceit, you’re probably ready to flop on your sofa. And stay there for the winter.

Before you do, there’s something I think you’d like to know.

If you’ve been tuned in to Terrible Truth, you may already met “Uncle Fred”.

You may have met him our very first day!

With Saps, Stool Pigeons And Stanley Ann’s Hair, Terrible Truth debuted with a video clip, “Eyewitness To The Assassination”.

I post it again, because by now you’re prepared to see.

Oh-oh. Could it be?

Could it be that the young man to the left of the screen, the white man behind / beside the speaker, is … young Fred Newman?!

“Eyewitness To The Assassination”

Watch, how he frequently looks toward traumatized Jo Ann Newman. Watch how concerned he is.

America, don’t be surprised if you some day discover, that Fred Newman is how Jo Ann Newman met Malcolm X.

Not only did Fred devote his life’s work to assisting and defending African Americans; his core political m. o. integrated that of Malcolm X: “BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY”.

So taken with Malcolm X was he, Fred wrote a play about Malcolm X: Billie And Malcolm [A Demonstration].

In 1993, the play was produced at his NYC theater.  http://broadwayworld.com/printcolumn.cfm?id=5277

While you’re looking at the playbill, you might notice that Fred wrote another play of interest to today’s topic: Sally and Tom [The American Way].

It dramatizes the interracial sexual relationship – and resulting offspring – between Thomas Jefferson, and [his slave] Sally Hemings.

From the play’s notes:

“Several years ago, DNA testing confirmed that America’s third President, Thomas Jefferson, fathered children by his slave, Sally Hemings.  Over the last 200 years, the Hemings-Jefferson relationship lived on in the oral histories of many generations of descendant families. These personal and family histories will be among the many subjects discussed in the conversation.

Newman stated, “For generations, many people have known that Jefferson fathered children by Sally Hemings. The much publicized results of DNA tests several years ago simply corroborate what had been common knowledge.” http://broadwayworld.com/printcolumn.cfm?id=5277

Hmmm….”the Hemings-Jefferson relationship lived on in the oral histories of many generations of descendant families….”

Like, perhaps, in the oral histories of the Newman – Malcolm X / Little / Shabazz families?

Now, Fred!

Surely you’re not suggesting a DNA test for “Barack Obama”, are you?

Ay yi yi!

Probably not, America.

That masterpiece – “Barack Obama” – would fall to pieces.

Fred worked too hard and too long to let that happen.

Fred Newman’s effective recruitment techniques, his glaringly evident hatred of those with money and position, and his manipulation of the emotions of the ‘underclass’ to evoke in them rage and retaliation against the United States Government have all come to the forefront of American political power in the genius creation of “Barack Obama II”.

The “Barack Obama II” synthetic identity I suspect Fred Newman was key in creating, long ago, having known - through Malcolm X, Jo Ann Newman’s idol and lover - the actual Barack Obama, who came from Kenya to New York City in August 1959; who spent considerable time there; who used his NYC sponsor Frank Laubach as his primary American contact for INS; and who remained in America through July 1964 – nearly five years in total.

“Barack Obama II”: the identity bestowed upon Bâri’ M. Shabazz, to prime and position him to run for national political office, and eventually, The United States Presidency.

As we in America have long sensed, “Barack Obama” didn’t come from ‘nowhere’.

And he didn’t do it on his own.

It is my considered opinion that “Barack Obama” sprung from a family-run political activist network which, since the 1960s, has been diligently “organizing” to achieve their socialist vision of America.  A network spearheaded by “Uncle Fred” Newman, the primary purpose of which was to “organize” the overthrow of America’s socio-politico-economic system - that is, to shift the American model from one of democracy and capitalism to marxist socialism.

To – with great, effective stealth – morph a country that is ontologically, happily theocentric, to one imposed with radical secular humanism.

To stomp out Our Founding Father’s Judaeo-Christian Vision Of America, and in its place raise up “Uncle Fred’s” Atheistic Vision of ‘Socially Just’ – i.e. Socialist – America.

Oh, how “Barack Obama” benefitted from their nearly half-century of scheming, genius, prodigious work!

“Barack Obama”: The Harvard Law Review Editor with an irrepressible yearning to ‘organize’.

At last, you ‘get it’. Don’t you?

Unlike America, in 2008.

What America got in The 2008 Obama Presidential Campaign wasn’t an independent-thinking, political meteor of an Ivy League guy with the gift of speech-making.

Indeed, we did not.

We got “Barack Obama”, RUI.  Running Under The Influence Of “Uncle Fred”.

- Private Investigator Neil Sankey contributed to this report -

If you appreciate the information presented at Terrible Truth, please assist me in my work by contributing $25.00 [or whatever you can afford].

“The Solution Is Always Simple”

by Martha Trowbridge

America, in a few short hours, we welcome The Sacred Birth Of Jesus Christ. A child born to welcoming, dependable, holy parents – whose lives were dedicated to raising, guiding, and nurturing Him.

How very blessed are children born into welcoming, loving, upright homes!

Sadly, many children are not. As they develop, and their relational needs are unmet or mutilated, they suffer “unthinkable anxieties”, “primitive agonies” [Winnicott]. Seeking relief from their pain, they often choose to travel improper paths, leading to further pain and degradation.

In the spirit of Christmas, I am asking you, America, to consider that “Barack Obama”, for all his great accomplishments, has greatly suffered; and in his suffering, chose paths he now regrets.

I truly believe that if he could do it all over again, he wouldn’t do it.

Please, permit me to introduce you to one of the holiest men I know. A former Mafioso from the Bronx, the man you meet today is thoroughly unrecognizable as the man he was before his spiritual awakening.

Twenty-six years ago, on 23 June 1985, after much agonizing deliberation, from a prison cell - just like Malcolm X  - he turned toward the Face Of God. And not for one living breathing moment has he turned away.

How I wish you could meet him! How I wish you could hear his story.

Last night, I was honored to converse with him. As always, I felt the spirit of Jesus Christ emanate from him across hundreds of miles of fiber optics, right into my heart. The compassion. The welcoming. The peace. It is no mystery why his home is filled with boxes of cards and letters from people whose broken lives have been healed by his witness.

“No matter how complicated your problems are” he counsels, “the solution is always simple: turn to God.”

This man embodies what The Monks Of Weston Priory describe in their Christmas Songs CD.  MP3 Downloads are available at  http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/monkswestonpriory8

“Morning softly awakens all of our deepest longings to be reborn … gifting us his presence, Jesus is born … Into the desert of our lives, bringing truth and freedom, God comes to us.” ["Morning Softly Awakens"].

America, in honor of The Sacred Birth Of Jesus Christ, let us lay down our anger, and find it within our hearts to genuinely welcome “Barack Obama” as he steps forth in Integrity. I sense you’d agree: it will not be an easy step.

Yet, it will be the most courageous step any American, in all our great history, has ever taken.

“Obama History” Mystery Buffs: Sniff Here

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.
This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK ABOVE

Way back when, in spring 1990, when Harvard Law School student “Barack Obama” was interviewed by Associated Press, he uttered three little words.

Three little Truth-ful words.

Today, at Terrible Truth, they return, full force, to haunt him.

Which is astonishing – for they were tiny little words. No doubt uttered in a moment of carelessness. A minor slip-up in the otherwise ‘perfect’ presentation of the personal history he was presenting to America.

How big a deal could they turn out to be?

Besides, “The Obama Narrative” was in test mode. Let’s give the guy a break – in spring 1990, he couldn’t help but feel exuberant. How well his political plans were progressing! He’d just been named Harvard Law Review Editor. His name, his face, his ‘history-making’ were garnering national attention.

All this, within less than two years!

How cool was that?!

Though he’d had considerable coaching by mentors, in May 1990, “Obama” hadn’t had much public practice.

And so, that exciting spring day, when his actual personal history was beginning to morph into “The Obama Narrative”, quite unwittingly, “Obama” talked Truth.

In an AP interview entitled Harvard Student Tackles Racism At Core, published 3 May 1990, he stated three words he surely has regretted:

“At age 2.”

Oh, how the tiniest details offer a gaping view into Truth.

For, the context of these three Truth-ful words is:

“Obama moved to Southeast Asia at age 2″.

America, the reason these three little words bear so much power may surprise you.

It’s not so much about when he went to Indonesia.

Their power lies in revealing where in Indonesia young Bâri′ went to live.

And who did not live with him.

“Barack Obama’s” Indonesian Odyssey did not originate with “Stanley Ann Dunham” taking him, hand-in-hand, at age six, to live with her and her new husband in a modest home in Jakarta – as “The Obama Narrative” wants you to believe.

All things considered, from what I can determine, at approximately age two, circa 1961, Bâri′ M. Shabazz apparently was sent to live at The Presidential Palace of Indonesian President Sukarno.

[You see why The Obama Campaign went to such great lengths to "establish" that he and "Stanley Ann" were in Seattle?]

President Sukarno – a Malcolm X hero, and long-time good friend.

President Sukarno: Revolutionary Extraordinaire. Sukarno, Man Against Oppression. Sukarno,  who bravely, brilliantly led the Indonesian overthrow of the ‘oppressive colonial’ Dutch Government.

President Sukarno: Indonesia’s first President.

Sukarno was amongst the earliest of revolutionary world leaders to whom Malcolm latched on. A man whom Malcolm held in great esteem from the time they met, until Malcolm’s death – and who, in return, held Malcolm in great esteem.

“Sukarno, Indonesia’s first president, and Malcolm X shared the platform at Harlem’s Abyssinian Baptist Church in 1956, introduced there by mutual friend Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. The relationship launched there endured until Malcolm X’s untimely death in 1965, two weeks before he was slated to speak at the Asian-African Islamic Conference in Jakarta [my emphasis]. He had also planned to attend the tenth anniversary celebration of the 1955 Bandung Conference, the first large-scale Asian-African conference.  Iandola explores this little-known relationship to illuminate their ideological affinities as well as the Cold War politics of the Third World.”

You may be wondering: how on earth would it come to pass that Sukarno would become involved with raising Jo Ann’s and Malcolm’s son?

A fair, reasonable question.

Pause a moment, and step inside the head of Malcolm X. You’ll straightaway find the answer.

Malcolm X: Always, Always, A Man With A Plan.

His conscious reasoning:

- Bâri′, his pride-and-joy son, is blessed with a sacred name, signifying his destiny http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/bari′-barry-barack/

- America is a racist, hateful country, an unfit place to raise a black boy

- His ‘sole male heir’ should have the best in life

- Sukarno will mentor the boy in the ways of political leadership

To Malcolm, what would be better, than to have his heir raised, schooled and groomed by a widely acknowledged, well-to-do, revolutionary, socialist President? In a non-racist, Muslim country, to boot?!

Sadly, Malcolm likely possessed unacknowledged motivation as well: as he gained his toddler mobility, young Bâri′ would become more and more visible. He’d be playing outdoors. Enrolling in school. Getting his voice. Becoming his own person. He’d even be asking his mother questions about his father.

Shipping him off to Sukarno would place the boy safely out of sight – protecting Malcolm’s reputation as a married Muslim Minister.

A Black Muslim Minister who waged public war against whites.

Besides. It was all for the boy’s “own good”. What kind of life would Bâri′ have, growing up in East Elmhurst without a live-in father? With a teenage mother with meager resources? Imagine who he could grow to be, raised by a man like Sukarno!

As Indonesia’s first President, Sukarno [1901 - 1970] held powerful international political connections – many of whom Malcolm idolized, publicly praised, visited, and with whom he fraternized. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBiJDMzzWaU&feature=related

What great opportunity Sukarno offered little boy Bâri′!

And now, America, I ask you to imagine this boy, set in a foreign country where most did not speak his language. Imagine him, barely verbal, left there amongst strangers. No more mother. No more dazzling Malcolm.

No more East Elmhurst, no more bedroom, no more tricycle.

No more America.

Bâri′, left there, oodles of thousands of miles away – “for his own good”.

From what I have gathered, I sense it was Malcolm’s idea.

As we all know, he could be very persuasive.

I also sense that, though she was young and single motherhood could not have been easy, Jo Ann was not in total concord with the plan.

But loving Malcolm, trusting his judgment, and stirred by his vision for young Bâri′, she agreed to the surrender of her toddler.

Perhaps in retrospect, Jo Ann Newman regretted the decision.

She may regret it still.

“My Lovely President Sukarno” offers glimpses into his life at home, in Indonesia http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN-zPe3-KN8&feature=related

Now for a surprise.

Wouldn’t it be fascinating, if, in the video still below, that’s young Bâri′ with mama Jo Ann Newman? With President Sukarno, from his limo, his eyes full of love and pride, blowing kisses at Malcolm’s and Jo Ann’s boy?

The boy who clearly had been taught two things: to wave, and to turn his face toward the camera.

Bâri′’s stay at Sukarno’s Presidential Palace didn’t last forever. In fact, his Indonesian stay may have lasted only four years – just as “The Obama Narrative” wants us to believe.

On 30 September 1965, Sukarno’s Presidential Guard soldiers executed six ‘trouble-making’ senior army generals, inciting a series of events which eventually led to his overthrow. Life became uncertain for Sukarno.

And so, life for young Bâri′ became uncertain too. [Keep in mind that his father, Malcolm X, had been assassinated just seven months prior.]

Within hours, Army Major General Suharto took command of a substantial part of Sukarno’s power base. Sukarno’s power continued to wane. A year and a half later, on 12 March 1967, Sukarno was stripped of whatever remained of his power by Indonesia’s provisional Parliament, and placed under house arrest. Suharto became President.

But back to Bâri′.

To October 1965. Sukarno begins his slip from power. Bâri′ M. Shabazz turns six.

Hmmm.

Could this be why “The Obama Narrative” has “Obama’s” mother arriving in Indonesia, when “Barry” is that age?

Coincidence? I don’t think so.

For those of you who’ve spent endless hours searching for “Obama’s” early history, including his school records, now you know why your searches have come up empty. It wasn’t your lack of skill.

They simply don’t exist.

President Sukarno would undoubtedly educate his children by carefully selected tutors.

Tutors who would school Bâri′ in diction. Elocution.

In international literature and culture.

In how to speak ‘The King’s English”.

“Obama” Trivia Question: When his grade school teacher asked “Of which country” did he want to be President – in response to his essay declaration – how did “Barry” respond?

Answer: “Barry” wasn’t yet sure.

Still unconvinced of Sukarno’s influence upon young Bâri′?

Then, for the moment, set aside the fact that Sukarno’s political philosophy merged marxism, nationalism and Islam.

I’ll show you his influence – in just two foreign words.

Two foreign words you may not be able to pronounce, but whose meaning you surely will recognize.

The inarguable imprint of Sukarno upon his precious young charge lies in “gotong royong”.

“Gotong royong is cooperation among many people to attain a shared goal.“ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotong_royong

As President, Sukarno had great faith in the philosophy of gotong royong.

Gotong royong – many people, shared goal. Now where in America have we heard that idea?

Oh. That’s right.

In “Barack Obama’s” resounding, celebrated 2008 Presidential Campaign Slogan – “Yes We Can” – a 21st century, simplified, pop version of gotong royong!

Here’s more:

Sukarno’s governing style was “Guided Democracy”.

“Claiming Western-style Democracy was unsuitable for Indonesia, he called for a system of guided democracy.  The Indonesian way of deciding important questions, he argued, was by way of prolonged deliberation designed to achieve a consensus. This was the way problems were solved at the village level, and Sukarno argued it should be the model for the entire nation. He proposed a government based not only on political parties but on “functional groups” composed of the nation’s basic elements, which would together form a National Council, through which a national consensus could express itself under presidential guidance.”

Hmmmm. Guided democracy…Prolonged deliberation…Functional groups.

“A National Council, through which a national consensus could express itself under presidential guidance.”

Now, why does this governing style sound so familiar?

You got it. It perfectly captures The “Obama” Administration.

The “Obama” Rule-By-Czar-ship.

In short, The “Obama” Way Of Governing.

And how about this?

Sukarno worked tirelessly to nationalize companies in Indonesia.

“By December 1957, Sukarno began to take concrete steps to enforce his authority over the country. On that month, he nationalised 246 Dutch companies which have been dominating Indonesian economy (most notably the NHM, Royal Dutch Shell subsidiary Bataafsche Petroleum Maatschappij, Escomptobank, Internatio, Geo Wehry & Co, Jacobson & Berg, etc)”

Oh, dear. This, too, Sukarno’s imprint on Bâri′?

If you still think I’m talking coincidence, take a good long look at this:

Sukarno cited the need for a CIVILIAN ARMY.

“He also stated his support for the establishment of “fifth force” of armed peasants and labor.”

Who amongst us has not heard “Obama’s” call for an armed Civilian Army here in America?

Before we step away from this tangle of psyches, one other striking similarity.

“While Sukarno devoted his energy for domestic and international politics, the economy of Indonesia was neglected and deteriorated rapidly. The government printed money to finance its military expenditures, resulting in hyperinflation exceeding 600% per annum in 1964-1965.”

[Quotes about Sukarno are sourced at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukarno]

Reasonable objections to my thesis, anyone?

Oh dear. How far afield we’ve traveled from our topic: Growing Up In A Presidential Palace.

Imagine: Power with a capital ‘p’. Fineries! Lavish attentions!

Respect.

Status. [Malcolm would have been in heaven!]

To all this, who would say no?

I bet that young Bâri′ wished that he could have declined.

On that fateful day, circa 1961, was toddler Bâri′ escorted to Indonesia by his father, Malcolm? Did Jo Ann take the trip?

Or, was he whisked away by some unknown head of state, or that dignitary’s staff person?

I think not.

I think young Bâri′ went to Indonesia with President Sukarno himself.  Perhaps late in April 1961, at age one and one-half, when Sukarno visted President John F. Kennedy in Washington D.C.:

http://www.jfklfoundation.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKWHP-AR6536-A.aspx

http://www.jfklfoundation.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKPOF-119-003.aspx

Audio file of President Kennedy’s Welcoming Remarks To President Sukarno http://www.jfklfoundation.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKWHA-024-002.aspx

Or perhaps Bâri′ was taken to Indonesia in early October 1961, at nearly age two, when Sukarno was in New York City at the United Nations General Assembly.

Presidential pomp and circumstance aside, in this man’s saga, does it much matter exactly when he was transplated to The Indonesian Presidential Palace?

What matters is its impact: his profound sense of abandonment. His overwhelming pain – today, still unresolved – from the decision made by his parents “for his own good”.

How it must have hurt like mad, when little Bâri′ arrived at that Palace. Eyeing the gaggles of Sukarno children, who looked and talked differently. Scanning adult stranger after adult stranger. Acclimating to an odd, wet, hot climate – and odder clothing.

To the unfamiliar walls – and bedding – of his sleeping quarters.

To the foreign food and foreign rituals.

Acclimating to the nurses and nannies and surrogate mother-figures – most of whom who likely spoke no English. Who could not explain for him what he was going through. Who could not console him.

His loneliness, though surrounded by crowds. His fear.

His pained attempts to bond with his father-substitute, the larger-than-life Sukarno, whose work kept him mostly away from The Palace.

The staggering absence of Jo Ann and Malcolm.

Toddler Bâri′, plagued with primitive anxieties, day after endless day, night after sleepless night, knowing – without comprehending why – that his parents gave him away.

One last point before we conclude.

Re: the baby photo referenced in Terrible Truth’s When The Bough Breaks, here’s the most likely story-behind-the-story:

By February 1962,  Jo Ann’s baby was gone from New York.

Quite naturally, Jo Ann would be missing him.  She’d be concerned for his well-being. She’d even be second-guessing her decision to ship him off to the other side of the world, and leave him in the care of strangers.

Consider that with that photo, Malcolm used the caption “THE YOUNG LISTENED”.

It is my assessment that placement of Bâri′ as an infant in this edition was Malcolm’s way of consoling Jo Ann at the loss of her child. His means of reminding Jo Ann that her child was in a far better place, being provided for in a far loftier way than she, a poor girl from the Bronx, or he, a married Muslim Minister, ever could offer the boy.

In an unexpected way, perhaps his father was correct, from this perspective: today, you don’t see “Barack Obama” happier than when he’s with the Indonesian President.

Though I suspect that if you could see inside his soul, you’d find geysers of hot sharp pain slapping up against his smile.

Obama Talks Dishonesty?

by Martha Trowbridge

America, clearly our prayers have not yet reached the soul of “Barack Obama”.

Yesterday, in his weekly radio/internet address, “Obama” talked dishonesty.

Not his dishonesty, mind you.

No. “Obama” talked about other people’s dishonesty.

Righteously, he demanded that his choice for Consumer Financial Protection Board director be approved, despite the fact that the Senate has told him no.

Refusing ‘to take no for an answer” he took his moral indignation to the American public, claiming that every passing day without his choice for CFPB director “is another day that dishonest businesses can target and take advantage of students, seniors and service members.”

To his word choices, pay close attention: “Obama” is going to protect us from those who are “dishonest”!

From those who  ”target”.

From those who “take advantage of”.

America, let’s pray that next week, when “Obama” addresses us, it is not the eye of the video camera, but the Eye of The Lord our God that stares back at him.

Shake, Rattle And Roll

by Martha Trowbridge

This morning, an AP article caught my eye.

“After Crime, Punishment Awaits Ex-Gov Blagojevich” by Michael Tarm states:

“The impeached state executive-turned-reality TV star has good reason to feel anxious and afraid at the two-day hearing in Chicago. He faces the prospect of 10 or more years behind bars.”

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/midwest/view.bg?articleid=1386374&srvc=rss

As I read these words, I couldn’t help wonder, when “Barack Obama” is brought to justice for his transgressions against America, what sort of sentence would be levied against him.

Actually, I should say, sentences.

For Truth be told, charges could be levied by Attorney Generals of all fifty states – not just by one, as with Blagojevich.

The Federal Government would also weigh in.

So how many years do you suppose Obama – excuse me,  Bâri′ M. Shabazz – would get?

Oh dear. Time to call on The Boss Of The Blues, Big Joe Turner. Time for another music blast from the 50s:

“Shake, Rattle And Roll”.

Obama’s 2012 Theme Song: “I Fought The Law, And The Law Won”!

by Martha Trowbridge

If you’re an oldies buff, you likely know that catchy tune by Bobby Fuller Four, “I Fought The Law, And The Law Won”.

If not, not to worry. You’ll know it soon.

In 2012, this song will haunt “Obama”.

And Eric Holder.

All across America, lo these past three years, voices have cried out in righteous protest to the vengeful attacks “Barack Obama”, Eric Holder, and others in the present administration have waged against The United States Constitution, America’s sacred traditions, and America itself.

Americans coast to coast have cried out in great anguish, as they’ve witnessed their willful destruction of our great country.

Destruction “Obama”, Holder, and their Gang Of Retaliators have gleefully waged, while lying straight-faced about what they are doing.

Thanks be to God, The Law is finally catching up with them.

I venture to predict, that rather than waging an election campaign in 2012, “Obama” will be waging war against the multiple corruption charges about to smack him upside of the head.

So will Holder.

America, please join me in thanksgiving to Almighty God that justice is soon to be served.

Tragically, “Obama” and Holder never quite “got it” that they have partaken in the best America has to offer anyone.

They’ve not for one moment appreciated  - or genuinely enjoyed – their good fortunes.

Have you ever heard them thank anyone who helped them along the way? Teachers, admissions committees, scholarship committees, employers, political mentors, political appointers – anyone?

Uh-uh.

Why?

They’ve been far too preoccupied by envy. Blinded by envy, you might say. Blinded to the fact that despite their vile denials, they are living proof that The American Experiment does work.

Deny it they must! Reality would quickly snuff out their burning envy.

And what would they do with their primitive pain? What could they do? Admit they’ve got a problem perceiving reality?

Envy is aptly named one of the Seven Deadly Sins. Like with all sins, there exists a range of intensity and frequency.

Pathological envy is envy so intense, so controlling, it compulsively seeks revenge. The kind of revenge that stops short at nothing less than whole scale destruction of persons envied.

“Obama”, Holder, and their Gang Of Retaliators have this fundamental character flaw in common: pathological envy.

Pathological envy of Americans oh so happy – and proud – to be Americans.

Jo Ann Newman: Far From Dead, Far From Gone

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved. 

This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK ABOVE

Last week, I saw an image that made me very sad.

It was the Visitors Book at Canberra, The Australian War Memorial.

The page’s dedication was inscribed:

The Honorable Barack Obama

President Of The United States Of America

As I studied his face in photos of the event, I wondered whether, as President “Barack Obama” inscribed it on 17 November 2011, he had the same thought I did: Some day soon this page will be torn from the book, and burned in disgrace.

He knows as well as we do: there is no honor in deceit.

Like presenting a synthetic mother, and synthetic photos of that mother – in slavitude – yes, slavitude – to his desperate determination to win The United States Presidency.

Like feeding fake after fake story to America’s media, counting on their good-hearted nature to print whatever he hands them.

Like despicably claiming his mother is dead – to keep her far from prying eyes.

For, America, the Truth is: the Mother of “Barack Obama’ is far from dead, far from obese, and far from ‘folksy’.

She’s been far from Indonesia, too.

All these years, The Mother of America’s “President” has been here, in America, working hard to support her treasured social causes.

She’s honored and respected.

She’s lovely, industrious, competent, and oh so committed to carrying on her lifelong shared vision with her beloved, Malcolm X: an America in which African Americans share generously in all the opportunities and rewards America has to offer.

Because I’m praying that her son will step forth and do the right thing, I am – for the moment – withholding her current identifying information.

The last thing I want to do is invade her life. She’s been through too much already.

Think about it.

She’s been shut out, silenced, ‘killed off’. She’s been represented by unflattering images. Her actual, lovely image has been distorted to grotesque.

She’s been lied about, used, and bandied to suit The Obama Campaign purposes.

She’s even been obscured from posterity, in video and stills, when on that horrific February day at the Audubon Ballroom, she kneeled, and lay over Malcolm, as he lay dying.

All this, for her treasured son.

The son she shared with her beloved, Malcolm X. The son upon whose tiny body they pinned their dreams for a fairer America.

As I contemplate this exceptional woman’s life, I wonder how many of those around her share her secret.

I wonder what they must think about all that she’s had to sacrifice, all these years, living incognito - in order that her mule headed son advance his career, his way.

Jo Ann Newman, living, clearly living, for years and years, though her son has pronounced her dead.

How hard it must have been for her – cause or no cause – to sacrifice personal recognition – for decades. For most of her adult life, really. Jo Ann Newman, in these demanding decades of women’s lib, ever-living through the lives of those she loved, placing her own life behind theirs.

For, since they met in the 1950′s, for the sake of Malcolm’s reputation, Jo Ann sacrificed public recognition of her role as his lover and mother of his child.

And since the early 1990′s, because “Barack Obama” deemed her a huge political liability, Jo Ann has been unable to publicly associate with her and Malcolm’s son.

It takes strength of character to make such great sacrifices.

Yet, isn’t that “true love”? The kind of love that puts the needs of your beloved ahead of your own?

Have you ever thought about this, Barack? That despite what you may feel, your mother truly loves you?

Barack: I entreat you, step into The Light.

Thousands of us will greet you in sincere, prayerful support of your decision to do the right thing.

We’ll applaud your step into Integrity in a way you’ve never before been applauded.

I promise you, Barack: the applause will be your sweetest ever – for it will be applause you earn honestly.

We know it won’t be easy. We also know it will be hugely relieving.

New, powerful, enduring pages could be inscribed in history:

The Honorable Barack Obama

The First World Leader To Make Things Right

As for you, dear Unsung Heroine Jo Ann Newman: please, reach out to your son. Just like you did with Malcolm, be strong for him. Guide him to the freeing power of Truth.

Now, more than ever, your son needs you.

A Homecoming… and Old Business

by Erik Rush

President Obama arrived in Indonesia this past Thursday on the final leg of his Asia Pacific tour, ostensibly to pave the way for private trade deals in the region that could mean billions of dollars and thousands of US jobs. Whatever. While some have made mention of Obama’s recent gaffes and stress, press photos showed someone appearing more relaxed than he has in weeks, hobnobbing with the movers and shakers of the Asia Pacific region.

Indonesia is, of course, where Obama spent many of his formative years, after being brought there by his mother. Perhaps it felt good to be back.

Interestingly, it was in 1955 that slain civil rights leader Malcolm X attended the first Conference of the Non-aligned Nations in Bandung, Indonesia. There, he made many fast friends, hobnobbing with the movers and shakers of the Asia Pacific region. He had actually been scheduled to attend another Non-aligned Nations conference in Indonesia in 1965. He’d even purchased his airline tickets; unfortunately, he was gunned down shortly before the trip.

Come to think of, how did young Barack wind up in a country (Indonesia) where Malcolm had forged such strong ties? Could it be that it’s because Malcolm loved Indonesia? Obama’s easy manner this week might stem from a certain sense of closure; perhaps he was picking up on dreams from his father.

Also interesting, that the Barack Obama II historical narrative includes Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, falling in love with Indonesian student Lolo Soetoro, marrying him and moving to Indonesia – but we know by now how unreliable that story has proven to be…

Malcolm X’s Most Momentous Moment

by Martha Trowbridge

America, I ask you to consider something with great seriousness.

What you’ve seen reported at Terrible Truth was enacted out of pain, the perception of powerlessness, and despair.

I’m talking human frailty.

I’m talking about suffering humans choosing a pathway that they may later realize was not the right pathway. But they find themselves so far down that path, they fear there’s no turning back.

But there is turning back. Just look at Malcolm X. Not just when, as a young man in prison, he transformed his ‘wayward’ life and joined Nation Of Islam. Many years later, as a seasoned Minister, as a very public figure, in spring 1964 he realized that, in fairness to what he had learned about life, it was time to modify a long-held position against white people.

Malcolm found the courage to publicly acknowledge his profound inner transformation. From what I understand about his personality – and his reputation – it could not have been easy to do so.

But he did it.

From an existential standpoint, it was Malcolm X’s most momentous moment.

I bet that loving Jo Ann Newman had a lot to do with his awakening. In Jo Ann’s steadfast love, Malcolm came to see his human frailty. So, Barack, I submit that not only was their love ‘improbable’, as you enjoy labeling it, your parents’ love was what love is meant to be: transformative.

If human love is this powerful, imagine Divine Love.

And Divine Mercy.

Barack, I know that making things right may feel impossible. I know it may feel overwhelming. But it isn’t. You’ve got everything you need within you to do it. I have faith in you. I’ve seen what you’ve sacrificed. I know the determined stock you come from.

Mother Angelica, foundress of EWTN, The Eternal Word Television Network [http://www.EWTN.com] teaches us: “Hate the sin but not the sinner.” How wise. How relieving for all of us – those injured, and those who injure  - to meditate upon this axiom. It gives us an elegant, appropriate framework for both accountability and compassion – and for human transformation – wonderfully tied together.

So you see, America, what was done emanated from human frailty. Nothing more and nothing less.

And what we can all now do about what’s been done, is to help Barack Obama make things right, by joining in genuinely assisting him to take the boldest step he’s ever taken.

The step into his future as a transformed man.

Stan The Sham, And True Love

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK ABOVE.

Today, Terrible Truth escorts you through the actual ‘Obama Birth Narrative’.

Don your hard hat and safety goggles. Pack plenty of aspirin. Once the lies start flying, it’s going to be rough going.

For the Truth is: there is no such person as Stanley Ann Dunham.

“Stanley Ann Dunham” was invented to hide the girl that “Barack Obama” judged America would never accept as the mother of a President. A 1950′s girl whose behavior, politics, and lifestyle wouldn’t find much approval, even today.

“Obama’s” real birth narrative isn’t set in an exotic American outpost. It’s got nothing to do with a corn-bred girl from Kansas, transplanted to Seattle, then once again uprooted, to be set in the soil of Hawaii.

It’s got nothing to do with a bigamous Kenyan, or college classmates engaging in sexual relations. No hasty marriage happened, in Hawaii or anywhere, once baby Bâri′ was conceived.

“Obama’s” real birth narrative runs like this:

Once upon a time, in the late 1950’s, a teenage girl from the Bronx – who was bright, rebellious and willful – fell head-over-heels for a charismatic, handsome, older man.

Her name was Jo Ann Newman.

It’s as simple as that.

However, she was white. He was black. She was single. He was married.  She was a teenage ‘infidel’ ‘townie’. He was a Muslim Minister.

It’s as complicated as all this.

Despite her intelligence, teenage Jo Ann Newman was understandably naïve. She likely didn’t comprehend what she was getting herself into.

Unhappy in marriage, thirty-something Malcolm X was flattered by young Jo Ann’s devotion. He likely didn’t anticipate the far-reaching consequences of their sexual relationship.

He surely would not have predicted that half a century later, America would be engaged in digging up details about the son born of his relations with young Jo Ann.

But life has a way of yielding the unpredictable.

Especially when the energy invested is considerable – like Jo Ann’s investment in Malcolm.

If you want to get to the Truth, ask anyone who knew Malcolm back then.  Were Manning Marable with us still, now that her name is no longer a secret, you might even get it from him.

Back then, Jo Ann was no secret. Everywhere she could, youthful Jo Ann Newman tagged alongside Malcolm. Not one speech or gathering could she bear to miss. New York or elsewhere, whenever, wherever possible, Jo Ann followed Malcolm. You might even say that during those years, Jo Ann Newman lived through him. Most times, when Malcolm was speaking, out in the crowd, there was Jo Ann. The stars in her eyes, the pride in her heart, the hope in her soul, tried as he might to resist, proved irresistible to Malcolm. Steady when he was fickle, dependable when he strayed, buoyant when he was down, Jo Ann was totally devoted to Malcolm and his cause – especially when he himself doubted.  From the moment they met, til the moment he died, and eternally beyond, always, Jo Ann Newman was there for Malcolm X Shabazz. Cheering him on. Bolstering him up. Admiring, encouraging, and most of all, loving him – without conditions or expectations.

Malcolm was Jo Ann’s forever-and-ever-true-love – even when she tried to prove to herself he wasn’t.

From their interactions sprang an ‘improbable love’, as often characterized by their son Bâri′. A dynamic, idolizing – idolized, once-in-a-million-lifetimes love.

Because their relationship brought to birth “Barack Obama”, Jo Ann’s and Malcolm’s love will forever be framed as legendary. An un-erasable theme in the Malcolm X saga; painful to many, understandably, yet an integral part of who Malcolm the man was – often contradictory, often perplexing, oh so public yet oh so private.

I’ll leave to another post Jo Ann Newman’s close biological relationship to another American legend: radical activist Fred [Frederick] “Delano” Newman, who died this past July. Ditto, her ties with Sanford Newman of Project Vote. Enough is enough for one sitting.

Today, let’s keep our focus upon Jo Ann. How pained she was by Malcolm’s tragic death.

And what she wrote about it.

Jo Ann Newman’s Tribute To A Black Man was published less than one month after Malcolm’s assassination, on 20 March 1965 in New York’s Amsterdam News, a prominent black weekly newspaper.

It is here, America, for history to directly witness in her heartfelt words, that Jo Ann Newman boldly and openly memorialized her love for and devotion to the father of Bâri′ M. Shabazz  [a.k.a. Barack Obama] – Malcolm X Shabazz.

Tribute To A Black Man was duly recorded in the F.B.I. files on Malcolm X.

The F.B.I., since 1953, ever-trailing Malcolm X.

The F.B.I., surely aware of Jo Ann Newman’s romantic relationship with Malcolm X.

Aware – and mindful – enough of their involvement, to add to their Malcolm X Files the eulogy Jo Ann published one month after Malcolm’s assassination.

Tribute To A Black Man is not only one of the few ’boutique’ newspaper articles included in the F.B.I.’s  Malcolm X post-assassination files, it is the only personal testament written by a woman that the F.B.I. recorded.

Recall, in this blog’s foundational post “Saps, Stool Pigeons And Stanley Ann’s Hair” [http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/saps-stool-pigeons-and-stanley-anns-hair/] that Malcolm’s teenage lover was seated in the front row at the time of his assassination.

Could Jo Ann Newman be one of the names redacted in Malcolm’s F.B.I. files, as someone questioned?

Could she be the female who, within days of his death, provided the F.B.I. with details about upcoming events in honor of Malcolm – including the “TRIBUTE” scheduled before his funeral?

Recall, as well, that Malcolm X’s eyeglasses – missing at the scene of his assassination – seem to have re-surfaced on the nose of “Barack Obama”. [http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/another-cold-case-file-closed-malcolm-xs-missing-eyeglasses/]

Is it any wonder that the F.B.I. had their eye on Little Miss Jo Ann Newman?

Are we to now wonder whether, when vetting Presidential Candidate “Obama”, the F.B.I. was complicit in his family-of-origin coverup – or worse, unaware of his lineage?

In Tribute To A Black Man, a note to the readers appears atop Jo Ann’s text.

“Editor’s Note: Miss Jo Ann Newman works in the Classified Advertising Department of the New York Amsterdam News.

But she asked for – and was granted permission – to write her own story of Malcolm X’s funeral.

This is her story:

Tribute To A Black Man By Jo Ann Newman”

Source: FBI: Malcolm Little – Malcolm X – New York File 32 of 41, page 27-28.

Now, how on earth does young Miss Jo Ann Newman, a lowly clerk in the Classified Advertising Department, merit such journalistic prominence?

Hmmm.

Consider this: from that very same edition of the newspaper – 20 March 1965 – immediately following her Tribute, on page 39 we find this declaration:

“No one knew Malcolm X better than the Amsterdam News staff. Of that staff, no one knew Malcolm X better than Jim Booker.”  Real Malcolm X / As Jimmy Booker Knew Him    FBI: Malcolm Little – Malcolm X – New York File 32 of 41, page 29.

Jimmy Booker: Executive Editor, The New York Amsterdam News.

Jimmy Booker: close associate to Percy Sutton, Malcolm X’s lawyer.

“Jimmy Booker’s Amsterdam News columns were must read destinations for the African-American weekly faithful. “http://harlemworldblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/update-jimmy-bookers-passing/

Ask yourself this: how did lowly Miss Jo Ann rate positioning of her Tribute AHEAD of famed Jimmy Booker?

And why oh why is Jo Ann Newman associated with The New York Amsterdam News, in the first place?

Here’s why: who better to employ Jo Ann Newman than the black weekly paper, The New York Amsterdam News? Jo Ann Newman, ever-trotting-after-her-true-love-Malcolm X?  Malcolm X, Hero to The New York Amsterdam News.  Jo Ann Newman, the mother of Malcolm’s son – his promising male heir, he who will be bearer of Malcolm’s legacy.

So …….

Who better than The New York Amsterdam News, after Malcolm’s assassination, to give Jo Ann Newman, mother of Malcolm’s heir – Bâri′ M. Shabazz – a platform from which to profess her undying love?

At her Tribute’s outset, Jo Ann paints Malcolm thus: “The threshold of Life. A fallen angel.”

Immediately, she sets herself in contradistinction to Malcolm.

Malcolm, she states, is “A family man, A Black man, A Man, A leader.”

“I am what I am, so be it” she states in comparison.

Which can only mean, she is: An unwed mother, A White woman, a Woman, a follower.

Hmmm. Sounds awfully familiar, doesn’t it?  Sounds like the mother of the man who presents himself as “Barack Obama”.

With each line, Jo Ann’s obvious prominence in the life of Malcolm X emerges.

“It is Saturday, Feb, 27, 1965. Faith Temple Church of God in Christ. I am standing in the pulpit, set aside for the newspapers, and all media’s of our great news services [my emphasis].”

Now, how could little Miss Newman, classified advertising clerk at the Amsterdam News, be standing alongside the national media – unless …. ?

Unless she has a rightful place there. A family-type-relationship place. In her Tribute, Jo Ann’s words relay the odd position she occupies: like Betty Shabazz, she is a grieving widow; but one who, for propriety’s sake, must go unrecognized.

For Jo Ann Newman, the political abruptly veers into the personal:

“I am watching history in the making. I am watching the world’s leaders from all fields arrive. We are here together. Yet, why then am I alone? My thoughts entirely of a Black man, who has been struck down, his body lies below me.”

An obvious sexualized reference. Is it conscious or unconscious on her part? Does she want us to know, via her words, that she and he were lovers?

 It seems that she did – she continues with sexual images:

“The crowd is swelling, the silence, the silence. Why is it so silent? Why is it so calm. Am I still alive? Yes I felt the pain from the pinch I gave my arm. Below me lies a a Man, a black man, an Afro American.”

Oh, how the past can foreshadow the future! Is it in her description of Malcolm’s funeral, that their son Bâri′ becomes obsessed with media companionship?

“It is now 10:00 a.m., Ossie Davis is before the microphone, the silence has fallen upon the multitude again. The click of the cameras, the hum of the the TV cameras, and yet the silence.”

Swooping back to her stillness /silence metaphor, Jo Ann cries out in anguish. The prospect of Malcolm’s message dying with Malcolm is unbearable. In great emotional pain, she demands that someone carry forth Malcolm’s dreams:

“A man, a leader, a black man, his voice is still. His ideas stilled. How much will be remembered of what he has taught his followers?” As she draws near the end of her Tribute, she shines the light on Ossie Davis, declaring Malcolm X “Our Own Black Shining Prince.” In Jo Ann’s literary reference, she passes that oh so tall order on to Malcolm’s heir – to their son Bâri′ M. Shabazz, who became known to the world as Barack Obama.

What ensued has become our American history. For Malcolm’s sake, Jo Ann has seen to it.

As you study Malcolm’s funeral memoir by Miss Jo Ann Newman of The New York Amsterdam News Classified Advertising Department, do you wonder, as did I: how ever does she know so much about Muslim tradition? How can she cite the “man of tall stature in the brown flowing robes”, and describe “the Islamic service. Imam Al Hajj Heshaans Jaaber recites four Takbeers.”

And how is no-one-special classified advertising clerk Jo Ann privy to knowing who sent what in honor of Malcolm X – referring to “many, many telegrams and letters sent from all over the world”?

How does a classified advertising clerk know the identities of the prominent people attending the funeral so intimately, that she fluidly cites them? “Ossie Davis, Ruby Dee, James Farmer, John Lewis, Bayard Rustin, Dick Gregory, Ralph Cooper.”

How can she handily identify the “Los Angeles NAACP, Chester Civil Rights Council, National Urban League, African Natl Council, Freedom Fighters of Ohio, Michigan Committee of Freedom Now, The Moors Of Haiti, Ambassador of Lagos, and many many more” as funeral attendees?

How does she know them – by name, by purpose?

How, indeed?

“Malcolm X Shabazz,” tenderly, she addresses him, in the beyond. “You have not fallen in vain. Your ideas, your ideals, your morals will be continued [my emphasis].”

Jo Ann is a girl with a plan.

She’s a girl who will put to work her traits of persistence, rebelliousness, and loyalty to Malcolm and his cause, to ensure that their son is vaulted from ‘nowhere’ to The White House.

“A heavy heart, a silent pen, my tribute to a history-making BLACK MAN” she says, in her Tribute’s conclusion. “THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE. A SALAAM ALEIKUM” – which, notably, were among Malcolm’s X’s last words to his faithful.

‘THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE” are your mother’s words of admonition, Bâri′ M. Shabazz.

Bâri′ M. Shabazz, a.k.a. “Barack Obama”.

Bâri′ M. Shabazz: you of no faith in America. America, who now must sadly discover: your mother “Stan” is a Sham.

For, Jo Ann Newman’s son did not believe that we would accept his mother, exactly as she was.

He didn’t believe we’d ever accept him either, born with a “double whammy’ of illegitmacy, and bi-racial genes.

And yet, he just had to carry forth the Dreams From His Father!

For, as you can see from her Tribute to Malcolm, the dreams are his mother’s, too.

What to do, Bâri′? How to do it?

Imagine…..Young man Bâri′, teeming with ambition, sits back. He takes a few puffs to quiet his head. Seeking guidance, he tunes into the psyche of his long-gone, genius father. His father, his mentor, his idol – savvy Malcolm X, the man who from his teens sported scores of handy aliases.

In time, his father’s spirit speaks.

“Reinvent!” Malcolm’s melodious, power-filled voice urges his eager son.  ”Reinvent your lineage!”

And so, Bâri′ invents a midwestern mother, bred from good Protestant stock. That’s what America wants, does it not, in its President? A boy born of a “nice” midwestern girl?  A Christian girl, to boot!

“Now find yourself a father,” Malcolm’s spirit directs him. “A father to give you what I could not – legitimacy.”

And so, Bâri′ invents a father, using his real father’s friend – Barack Obama from Kenya.  A father who meets “Stanley Ann”, ingenue college freshman, in an exotic – though American! – setting.

A father who – as America loves – does the right thing, and marries his pregnant mother.

“One last masterful touch, my son,” says Malcolm. “Alter the records. The state and federal census records, to invent a geneaology. It’s a cinch these days, when everything is digital!”

So, Bâri′ busily works to make his synthetic family real “in the system”, to mislead all who research his “family-of-origin”.

Timing is everything, isn’t it, Bâri′?! Do what you need, to get to be Harvard Law Review Editor! Get that book contract before you graduate! Morph the book’s theme from a commentary on race relations in America – as stipulated in your book contract – into an “autobiography” panhandling your synthetic “family of origin”.

Put your “family” out there far enough ahead of your political entrée, and your story will become familiar!

Eventually, with enough ‘reporters’ regurgitating what you feed them, your family fabrication will ring ‘true’.

In your clever calculations, Bâri′, you made one foolish omission:

The power of Truth to out lies.

As for Jo Ann Newman, one of a zillion dark-haired, big-eyed New York girls from the fifties – hey, thought her smarty-pants, big-shot, Ivy League son, who ever would remember her?

What’s more, even if they do, enshrined in her brand new identity, who could recognize her – what with all the digital smoke and mirrors her son applied to her face? To her eyes. Her nose. Her chin. Her hair. Her cheeks. Who?

Who, huh?

You’d be surprised, Bâri′. You’d be surprised.

Writer’s Note:

America, I communicate this information with great grief – and ask that, as you discover the Truth, you receive it with compassion.

It’s not that I countenance or condone what’s been done. Far from it. I’m outraged. Hurt. Horrified.

Most importantly, I feel thoroughly betrayed by America’s media – who willfully abandoned their solemn responsibility to verify the data presented by The Obama Campaign.

But if we as a country are to come through this intact, we must rise to our moral high calling. Hateful accusations and vengeful behavior will only worsen our situation – and accomplish nothing constructive.

Please, pray for Barack Obama.

Poor Bari Shabazz, A Fugitive At Large. Of Course He’s Got To Hide Out As Barack Obama!

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

Run, Bâri′, run! You’ve got the law after you.

And while you’re at it, run for Illinois State Senator. Run for United States Senator.

Run for President, even!

The point is, young man: RUN!!

You know how racist the police are. Daddy Malcolm said so.

If you can stand it, here’s the scoop:

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-hussein.html

America, meet Bâri′ M. Shabazz, your inimitable President – the guy who’s expert at running:

http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/bari′-barry-barack/

Bâri′, Barry, Barack

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

White House Press Corps: may I inquire? Were any of you invited to the birthday party Friday?

If not, don’t feel miffed.

After all, it’s long been a family secret.

Anyway, here’s the scoop: Friday was Bâri′’s birthday.

Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth.

Yes, 28 October was the day, in 1959, in New York City, that the man who presents himself as Barack Hussein Obama was born Bâri′ M. Shabazz.

A baby thrice bestowed with names sacred to Malcolm X: Bâri′, Malik, and Shabazz.

Oh so happily bestowed by his mother, who truly-and-forever loved Malcolm.

It wasn’t just the sacred nature of these names that so delighted his proud parents.

It was what the names signified.

Bâri′ - Muslim name meaning “Of Allah”.  According to Islam, God as al-Bâri′ is the creator of all: http://www.harunyahya.com/isim_sunum/bari.html     “al-Bâri′: The Maker, The Producer, The Evolver, The Maker From Nothing …  Bâri′ denotes the way the One [my emphasis] works with substances, often creating from existing matter, making and evolving that which is free and clear of any other thing, free and clear of imperfections.”  http://wahiduddin.net/words/99_pages/bari_12.htm

Note the reference to “The One”, a popular attribution to Barack Obama during the campaign.

Malik / Malachi – Names most sacred to Malcolm. “Lord”, “Master”, ‘Sovereign”, “King” … Malik is Arabic for Malachi [Messenger of God]. In 1952, Malcolm requested permission from The Honorable Elijah Muhammad [his Nation Of Islam spiritual director] to assume the name Malachi Shabazz – approval that was denied him. In spring 1964, after Malcolm left Nation Of Islam, he assumed the identity El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/08/books/malcolm-x-a-life-of-reinvention-by-manning-marable-review.html?pagewanted=all

Shabazz - Malcolm’s chosen Muslim last name. It’s the Muslim name his wife Betty also chose. The name they bestowed upon all six children.

Among the Malcolm X aliases certified by the F.B.I. are Malachi Shabazz, Malcolm Shabazz and Malik El-Shabazz.

Bâri′, Barry, Barack ….. Sort of has a cadence to it, doesn’t it?  Reminds me of the days I studied Greek and Latin. Studied the conjugation of verbs. Bâri′, Barry, Barack. His past [imperfect] tense, his present tense, his future tense.

Bâri′, Barry, Barack: he was, he is, he will be.

So it was for high school Barry. His past collides with his future. Barry, discovering his birth certificate amongst sequestered documents. Discovering his Muslim identity – and the name of his biological father.

And in that discovery, recognizing “I occupied the space where their [his parents’] dreams had been”. A stunning realization.

A future must be created!

Politics, yes, this is the proper path. National politics.

The very same path that daddy Malcolm had his yearning eye upon.

His son would go one better, though. His eye would firmly fix upon The White House!

But wait.  Who would elect to The United States Presidency the illegitimate son of a black Muslim revolutionary?  A man who advocated overthrow of The United States Government? Who openly spoke of his hatred of whites?

His past as Bâri′ would never do.

Not to worry! Bâri′ is destined for great things. His genes, his birth names said so. He will create an identity “free and clear” of Malcolm’s political liabilities.

A ‘tweak’ of his name’s second syllable, and voilá! Bâri′ and Barry become “Barack”.

The synthetic  ”son” of  Malcolm’s African friend, Kenyan exchange student Barack Obama. 

The synthetic  ”grandson” of Malcolm’s hero.

[For those of you unfamiliar, Barack Obama was the son of Mau Mau Kenyan Revolution Hero, Hussein Onyango Obama. In the early 1950's, Malcolm was publicly singing HOO's praises in Harlem - years before his son, Barack Obama, arrived in America.]

And so, a future was created.

An identity was born: “Barack Obama II” – a.k.a. “Barack Obama Jr. “

Such creative genius! A simple ‘tweak’, and Bâri′ M. Shabazz gets his new identity – and an unencumbered, bright political future!

With a birth narrative boasting exotic, tropical settings, to boot!

But back to young Bâri′, shall we? After all, it is his birthday we’re discussing.

And back to Barry.

How much closer in sound can two names get?

Perhaps you recall Michelle Obama’s statement during the campaign, when asked about Barack’s nickname, Barry? She stated that its origin was a cute Muslim name, anglicized to “Barry”. If you don’t recall her statement, please, don’t waste your time looking for it online. The clip was long ago scrubbed.

Perhaps you recall that at Occidental College – coincident with his grand political plan to fulfill Malcolm’s Dreams – “Barack Obama” insisted that “Barry” be ditched for Barack?  A brilliant strategic move indeed. Barry sounds far too close to Bâri′. What if somebody, anybody, from his past, or from the present, or worst of all, in the future, caught on?

But oh, how Truth endures. Thank goodness, amidst all the deceit, the words of half-sister Maya expose it: around the house, she stated, we called him “Bar”.

Bâri′, Barry, Barack ….. Now, who is who, and what is what?  “Barack Obama”, we all know.  “Barry Soetoro”, ditto. But what do we know of Bâri′ M. Shabazz?

We know this: Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.

[Wait. Wasn't there discussion of an SSN issued earlier than 1977? Sometime around the summer "Barack Obama" was 14?  Let's see. Summer 1974 minus October 1959 equals ... yes, that's right, 14.  Hmmm.]

But let’s not let “Barack Obama” distract us again. Back to his past [imperfect] tense.

Quite naturally, you may wonder, as did I: whatever happened to sweet baby Bâri′?

I’ve got tragic news to report, on this All Souls Day: in August 1994, at the prime-of-life age of 34, five years younger than was his father Malcolm at his untimely death, Bâri′ M. Shabazz was reported to have died.

From the Social Security Death Index database:

SHABAZZ, B M            28 Oct 1959                  Aug 1994 (V)            34            (PE)            (none specified)            New York            084-54-5926

Hmmm ….. August 1994: Bâri′ M. Shabazz has passed on. 

Oh dear. Whatever will become of all those Dreams Bâri′ was conceived to carry forth?

Not to worry. He didn’t really die.  His birth identity ‘had’ to die.

Why?

Let’s see. 1994. 1994. Oh! That’s right! On 21 August 1994, the Illinois State Senate seat ‘officially’ opened up! Its occupant, Alice Palmer – for whom “Barack Obama” was working – could now set her sights on indicted Mel Reynolds’ Congressional seat.

“Barack Obama” was prepping to step out as a political candidate!!

“Congressman Mel Reynolds, the Democrat convicted of 12 charges, including sex with 16-year-old Beverly Heard and asking her to take pornographic photographs of a 15-year old, was indicted on August 21, 1994.”

http://newsbusters.org/node/8110#ixzz1OM9ilHH9

What with his prodigious plans, “Barack Obama” certainly couldn’t risk having Bâri′ M. Shabazz walking around, now, could he?!

A simple report was all that was needed.

The SSDI record states that the death information for Bâri′ M. Shabazz was coded “V”.

V signifies: “Verified: Report verified with a family member or someone acting on behalf of a family member.”

The report is not coded “P“.

P signifies: “(Proof): Death Certificate Observed”.

This distinction is critical.  Notice of death was made by an informant who did not present verification of his/her reporting, that is, no death certificate was presented with the notification of death.

“SSA receives reports of death from a variety of sources, including friends and relatives of deceased individuals, funeral homes, postal authorities, financial institutions, and Federal and State agencies.  Friends, relatives, and funeral homes report about 90 percent of deaths. Postal authorities and financial institutions report another 5 percent of deaths.”

Once in the federal system, the record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.

Oooops.

Complications.

And now, since you’ve had the forbearance to read along this far, I offer you comic relief.

The first listed address for Bâri′ M. Shabazz is: guess where?

One street over from Malcolm X’s house!

From baby’s conception in 1959 through shortly before Malcolm’s death in 1965, Malcolm lived just one street over from Bâri′ M. Shabazz’s first address in East Elmhurst, New York.

The first address listed for Bâri′ M. Shabazz is 32-26 98th Street, Apt.1, East Elmhurst, New York.

Malcolm’s 1959 address was 25-46 99th Street, East Elmhurst, New York.

Malcolm and his family resided at 23-11 97th St. East Elmhurst, New York, from July 1960 through February 18, 1965, three days before his death.

BM Shabazz (Bari M Shabazz)

B 10/28/59
D 8/94
SSN 084545926

Residences
Street Address            City            Name on phone            Phone #

1            3226 98TH            ST APT 1            EAST ELMHURST, NY 11369

2            32 98            EAST ELMHURST, NY 11369

3            HQCO SUC BN            QUANTICO, VA

4            1 HQ CO MCDEC            QUANTICO, VA

5            HQ CO SERV BN            QUANTICO, VA

6            99999 MILITARY APT            QUANTICO, VA 22134

7            HQCO HQSVCBN MCDEC            QUANTICO, VA 22134

8            HQCO SERV BN            QUANTICO, VA

9            99999 MILITARY APT            QUANTICO, VA 22134

Source: Intellius.

Speaking of addresses, don’t you love poor ‘dead’ Bâri′s Virginia addresses?!  Fake military addresses – that’ll fool the snoops, eh!  Military addresses clearly ‘created’ by someone who didn’t know diddly about the military.

My, how we’ve digressed! I wonder how the birthday party went. White House Press Corp, please, tell me: Was there a cake? With 52 gleaming candles? In their private quarters, sequestered safely away from The Secret Service, did any of you happen to hear “The Obamas” sing Happy Birthday? 

 2 November 2011, The Commemoration Of All Souls

Another Cold Case File, Closed: “Malcolm X’s Missing Eyeglasses”

by Martha Trowbridge

Research Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge and Erik Rush. All Rights Reserved.

Post Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

Mystery meets [Medical] History today, as a cold case is solved.

First, the historical medical marvel.

Barack Obama, who according to official medical reports has 20/20 vision, apparently needs eyeglasses.

Not just any eyeglasses, mind you. And certainly not when he’s in public.

He doesn’t even need them when he’s awake.

Obama needs these eyeglasses when he’s sleeping!

White House Photo

Oh dear, what have we here?

Could it be?

Could Obama be wearing Malcolm X’s eyeglasses - broken left arm and all?

Must be that Obama’s channeling dreams. Channeling Dreams From His Father.

Which leads us to the mystery:

How on earth could Obama get his hands on Malcolm’s eyeglasses?

Hmmm.

Maybe, just maybe, mama Stanley Ann got her hands on them, shortly after Malcolm was shot – and eventually passed them on to their son.

For, Truth Be Told, when Malcolm was shot at the Audubon Ballroom, 21 February 1965, as usual, he was wearing his eyeglasses.

Yet when he was wheeled out, his eyeglasses were off.

Then -

No eyeglasses on Malcolm’s body at the wake.

No eyeglasses at the funeral.

Whatever happened to Malcolm X’s eyeglasses?

Now that we have the White House photo, above, it may not be a mystery after all.

Picture the scene of the crime. The audience has fled. Malcolm has just been taken out by the medical emergency crew.  His wife and children have been whisked away.  And where is Stanley Ann, his long-time lover? Stanley Ann, teenage lover, sitting in that front row to the right. Stanley Ann, jumping up in shock and horror. Stanley Ann, watching the attempts to save Malcolm, watching as the medics work on him, watching as he is wheeled forever away.

What is she feeling?

In her great grief and shock, what is she thinking?

Study the assassination crime scene photo, taken much later, below.

No eyeglasses.

February 1965 Audubon Ballroom Crime Scene Photo by Stanley Wolfson

Think.

Malcolm has been wheeled away. Teenage lover Stanley Ann is unable to follow Malcolm to the hospital – what with his wife Betty and the press heading over there. Distraught, she stays behind. How can she bear it?  She looks to the stage. Her lover’s jacket lies folded atop the drum riser. His shirt lies on the floor. The chair against which he fell when shot, is tipped on its back.

And there, amidst the hideous chaos, are his eyeglasses. His precious, signature, tragically broken eyeglasses.

Perhaps they too lie on the floor, tossed aside, the left arm snapped as it was torn off by the medics – or inadvertently crushed, in the chaos.

Or perhaps someone has reverently placed them – frame plus broken arm – on the drum riser, next to his jacket.

Most everyone is gone. The stage is deserted.

Stricken with pain, and anger, and grief, Stanley Ann steps up onto the stage. Quickly, she fetches the eyeglasses, along with their broken arm. Hiding them in a pocket or handbag, she hurries away.

Malcolm X’s Missing Eyeglasses Cold Case: solved.

Attorney Mario Apuzzo, when viewing this photo of Obama sleeping on the White House sofa, made a brilliant observation. These eyeglasses could have Malcolm’s DNA.

So you see, it’s all very simple. A quick swab of a Q-tip on the roof of Obama’s mouth … paternity controversy over.

Nesting or Red-Rooster-ing, It’s Memory Lane For Obama

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

If you want to peek down Obama’s two fondest Memory Lanes, don’t look to Hawaii.

Look to Chicago, to his ‘nest’. And to Harlem, to his choice of Red Rooster Restaurant for his March 2011 DNC fundraiser.

Nesting or Red-Rooster-ing, Obama’s Memory Lanes are saturated with memories of Malcolm X.

To paraphrase a popular axiom, our nest is where our heart is. For Obama, since 2005, his nest is 5046 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago, IL.

Though the structure is indeed stunning, 5046 South Greenwood means a lot more to Barack Obama than just grand architecture.

It’s the closest he could possibly come, to surrounding himself with memories of his beloved lost father, Malcolm X. How?

In two fundamental ways: architecture and environs.

Architecturally speaking, 5046 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago IL is a grandiose version of the home Malcolm and his family occupied until the week before Malcolm’s death.

Obama Residence, 5046 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago

Malcolm X Residence,  23-11 97^th Street, East Elmhurst, New York

Photo taken after 14 February 1965 firebombing

Both homes are brick with a center entrance and central front dormer.  Both sport a hip roof.  Twin windows flank the front door. Above the front, on the second level, are two adjacent windows.

White painted window frames and sills adorn the houses.

Twin pines stand in the front yard – at both homes, the one to the right is fuller, healthier, than the one to the left.

Both homes feature a wrought iron fence.

The land to the left of both structures is wider than the land to the right; with an alley-like walkway strip to the right of the structures.

 

And that’s not all. The architectural style of Obama’s home is Georgian Revival.  Malcolm’s father Earley [Obama’s biological grandfather] is from Reynolds, Georgia. So are Earley’s two sisters, with whom Malcolm lived in Boston in the early forties, following his mother’s institutionalization.

If style and looks are not enough to make Obama feel close to his long lost father, how about this?

His home’s environs connect Obama with the happiest years of Malcolm’s life.

Obama’s home at 5046 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago is just a stroll away from 5335 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago, home and headquarters of Malcolm’s spiritual advisor, The Honorable Elijah Muhammad.

5335 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago was also, for years, the site of the annual Nation of Islam Saviour’s Day Convention – an event much cherished by Malcolm.

Obama’s Real Beef With Churchill’s Bust

by Erik Rush

One of Barack Obama’s first official acts upon being sworn in as President of the United States was to return a bust of British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill to Britain. The bust, which once occupied the Oval Office, had been loaned to George W. Bush by the British government in a show of solidarity after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.

Was this Obama’s rejection of international support against Muslim extremism? Or was it much more than that?

While this action created tension between the US and the UK (which would be later exacerbated by Obama’s shabby treatment of our ally), many observers surmised that this was a symbolic slight meant to punish the British government’s imperialistic policies of the past – in particular, those which had detrimentally affected the people of Kenya, from whence Barack Obama Sr., had come.

There is a more likely explanation, if one understands that the President’s biological father was in fact Malcolm X, rather than Barack Obama Sr. The slight against the Obama’s sensibilities was far more painful.

Just three days before his father’s assassination, England had considered banning Malcolm forever from its soil.

When The Bough Breaks

by Martha Trowbridge

Research Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge and Erik Rush. All Rights Reserved.

Post Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

Hush-a-bye baby, upon the tree top

When the wind blows the cradle will rock;

When the bough breaks the cradle will fall,

Down tumble cradle and baby and all 

Mother Goose’s Melody, 1765

It’s a windy day, here in America. Very windy. Quite appropriate, since what I’m about to show you is a photo from ‘The Windy City’ – yes, Chicago – many years ago. What’s more, it’s a photo published in a Chicago newspaper.

Malcolm X’s newspaper – Mr. Muhammad Speaks.

For those of you unfamiliar, Mr. Muhammad Speaks is Nation Of Islam’s newspaper.

Before you take a peek at the photo, I’d like to tell you a bit about Malcolm’s relationship with Mr. Muhammad Speaks. 

Mr. Muhammad Speaks was Malcolm X’s creation. It was his ‘baby’ throughout his term as NOI Minister.

“In 1960, the national spokesperson for the NOI, Malcolm X, founded the newspaper Mr. Muhammad Speaks in Chicago” 

http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/869.html

Now that you know the connection, here’s the scoop:

A photo in Muhammad Speaks places Stanley Ann Dunham and Baby Barack at Malcolm X’s Nation Of Islam Annual Rally in Chicago, Illinois. Allegedly taken on 23 February 1962, the date is coincident with Stanley Ann’s alleged enrollment at The University Of Washington in Seattle.

This edition of Muhammad Speaks, dated April 1962, has a front page caption that reads:

“More than 12,000 people on February 23 gathered in Chicago’s International Amphitheater to hear Messenger Elijah Muhammad speak on The Future Of The American So-called Negroes.”

Inside the newspaper, on page 18, Ann and baby Barack are placed just below, to the left of a photo of Malcolm X, with the caption “The Young Listened”.

Perhaps this is when Barack took up ‘the cause’?

For now, that doesn’t matter.  What matters is: that baby’s face.

 

Years May Pass, But Some Things Stay The Same – Like Stanley Ann’s Long Fake Hair

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

According to The Obama Campaign, poor Stanley Ann had hair trouble for years!

Trouble enough to warrant constant graphics fussing.

Ten years after the mother-son photo, there’s mama Stanley Ann, once again in the grass, once again sporting fake long hair.

Courtesy, The Obama Campaign

You needn’t fetch your eyeglasses. See that mop of fake light hair on the right side of her neck?

In case all that magenta splashed on her image has you blurry-eyed, here’s a visual aid:

 It’s getting to be predictable, isn’t it?

Same Day, Same Girl, Same Fake Hair – Though Now, It’s Green!

by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

Oh, Stanley Ann! Must we draw you – again – into the fray?

In case you haven’t heard: your Mother-And-Son photo was falsified.

And I’m truly sorry to report that another photo of you has suffered the same fate. Whatever did you do to deserve such indignity?

In this image, allegedly taken the very same day, there you are, mama Stanley Ann Dunham, luxuriating in the grass, sporting the same dress – and sporting the same fake hair.

Courtesy, The Obama Campaign

Now, if our readers are generous in spirit, and overlook the fact that your hairdo is a wee bit different from when you prop up Barack, your toddler son, on the fence in your mother-son photo, I’ll show them [and you] what happens, when we turn up the photo’s brightness.

It’s magic!

Rather than reading black as in the mother-son photo, in this concurrent glimpse into Obama Family Life, fascinatingly, your fake hair reads green!

Excuse me, please, Stanley Ann, but I must now turn to our readers. They’re ravenous for Truth.

Saps, Stool Pigeons And Stanley Ann’s Hair

by Martha Trowbridge

Research Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge & Erik Rush.

All Rights Reserved.

If David Brooks at The New York Times feels he was taken for a ‘sap’ by Barack Obama, we shudder to think how everyday Americans will feel, once they find out the Truth.

Obama’s Mother And Son photo was falsified to deceive us.

Courtesy, The Obama Campaign

Recognize it? Yes, that’s the same photo as was used on the cover of Janny Scott’s A Singular Woman, her biography of Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother.

It’s the same photo Obama used in his Obamacare television ad.

So what’s the big deal?  In a moment, we’ll tell you. For now, all you need to understand is this:

The photo was falsified to deceive us.

Truth is, mama Stanley Ann didn’t have long hair when Barack was young.  Until, of course, with photoshop-type tampering, The Obama Campaign made sure we’d think that she did.

Here’s a peek into Truth.  All that darkness, making us think we’re seeing long hair, is nothing but graphics illusion:

Another reality-check:

As if the deceit with her hair weren’t insulting enough, in the view below, note the futzing with the corner of her mouth, in order to widen it.  See the [pink] added tooth. Look closely, you’ll see her original top lip line, curving down to the last white tooth – and the fake new lip lines, extending past the fake, pointy, pink tooth … And while you’re looking, don’t miss the fake ‘closed’ eyelid applied to her open eye.

Her nose, we’ll leave for another discussion.

Hey, David Brooks:  you’re in sap good company.

Now, you may be wondering: why does it matter, whether mama’s hair was short or long?  Whether her mouth was narrow or wide?  Or why her eyes seem always half-closed, and hidden?

Here’s why: Obama was worried you’d find her in places, at key strategic times, with people he couldn’t let you know about.

People like Malcolm X. Times like the early and mid-1960′s. Places like New York City.

For instance – what if you saw this image?  The image of his mother, Stanley Ann, in February 1965, at the wake / funeral of militant black leader, Malcolm X?

What if you recognized her?

Obama sure as heck wouldn’t want you to view the video in which her image resides:

“Eyewitness To The Assassination”

Why not? Because though he claims his mother was thousands of miles away in Hawaii, the fact is, there Stanley Ann was in New York City, February 1965, there, right there, at Malcolm X’s wake and funeral.

So it just may be that Barack Obama’s father isn’t Barack Obama “Sr”, after all.

The Truth lies in the long and short of it. Of Stanley Ann’s Hair, that is.